[OPS-1161] Add withHardeningProfile helper
#158
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Problem: We want to harden our systemd services by using previously defined profiles, so we need a way to easily apply them to our systemd service configurations. Solution: Add withHardeningProfile helper, remove DeviceAllow from profiles, because it is used incorrectly (systemd complains and skips this option), and the semantics of this use is already covered by PrivateDevices.
This was referenced Mar 5, 2024
rvem
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2024
delete-merged-branch
bot
deleted the
sereja/OPS-1161-add-withHardeningProfile
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem: We want to harden our systemd services by using previously defined profiles, so we need a way to easily apply them to our systemd service configurations.
Solution: Add withHardeningProfile helper, remove DeviceAllow from profiles, because it is used incorrectly (systemd complains and skips this option), and the semantics of this use is already covered by PrivateDevices.