Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SATELLITE LINKS] PR 5: Simulation Tests and Documentation #561

Draft
wants to merge 52 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pfittipaldi
Copy link
Collaborator

@pfittipaldi pfittipaldi commented Jul 5, 2024

This PR ties the previous ones together: it includes some hotfixes that were overlooked in the previous ones, but mostly it is about the simulation tests for satellite configurations and the documentation of the modifications that were made.


This change is Reviewable

Paolo Fittipaldi and others added 30 commits July 4, 2024 09:06
naming needs to be fixed: getTravelTimeLocal should
be getCurrentTravelTime.
…lows routing decision even when satellite nodes start non-visible.
which was lost while cherry-picking
…esting while skipping omnetpp's listener checks
references to pointers to facilitate testing.
Note: A conflict was managed here when rebasing.
manually set the visibility parameters of free space channels
according to a duty cycle. This is not the definitive implementation and it
does not work with the current FreeSpaceChannels, but it I left it here for
documenting purposes.
Paolo Fittipaldi and others added 22 commits July 4, 2024 09:17
…em from GatedQueue subclass.

Also fixed duplicate declaration.
…as the one in FreeSpaceChannel) to allow for routing non-visible satellite links
…tion with a GatedQueue in satellite nodes without omnetpp complaining
…ight to improve readability and compatibility with the fiber code + small correction in the first photon offset in BSAController
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants