docs: Talos Upgrades should focus on preference for Image Factory images #73
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added guidance on using Image Factory for Talos upgrades and included a pro tip for retaining configuration. Signed-off-by: Glenn <[email protected]>
Updated the upgrading Talos documentation to clarify the upgrade process and emphasize the use of custom images from the Image Factory. Signed-off-by: Glenn <[email protected]>
glenn2223
changed the title
public/talos/v1.11/configure-your-talos-cluster/lifecycle-management/upgrading-talos.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Removed emojis, as requested Signed-off-by: Glenn <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on the discussion I had with @smira over at siderolabs/talos#12018, upgrading Talos Linux should have a preference for updates being done with an Image Factory schematic
This is my first suggestion to update the docs to reflect that.
A couple of points: