docs: add comprehensive security and code audit report#397
docs: add comprehensive security and code audit report#397jiangqilong41-ops wants to merge 1 commit intositeboon:mainfrom
Conversation
- Critical security issues: command injection, hardcoded JWT secrets, token expiration, XSS vulnerability, plaintext credentials - Major issues: monolithic files, zero test coverage, path traversal, missing error handling - Recommendations: database indexing, React.memo, structured logging
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new comprehensive security audit report document is added, detailing critical vulnerabilities (command injection, hardcoded secrets, JWT configuration issues, XSS), major issues across multiple categories, and improvement suggestions with remediation guidance. Changes
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md (1)
1-1: Move the report out of the repository root intodocs/security/.Audit reports placed at the repository root create clutter and are typically scoped under
docs/ordocs/security/in well-organized projects. This also makes it easier to co-locate future audit reports, threat models, and security policies.♻️ Suggested rename
-SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md +docs/security/SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md` at line 1, Move the SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md out of the repository root into docs/security/ (i.e., create docs/security/ and place SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md there), update any references to this file (README, CONTRIBUTING, docs index, CI workflows, or links) to point to docs/security/SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md, and ensure repository navigation (mkdocs/site config or other docs tooling) includes the new path so the report remains discoverable.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md`:
- Around line 1-11: The audit report currently lists 55 findings but contains no
linked GitHub Issues or Security Advisories; create GitHub Issues or private
Security Advisories for each critical and major finding, include issue numbers
and links in SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md adjacent to each finding in the
table/sections (e.g., next to the rows under “审计类型”/“严重问题”), and for each linked
issue add severity, reproducible steps, owner, and remediation ETA so the report
meets the Contributing.md requirement to "reference issue numbers" and "link
related issues" before merging.
- Around line 17-66: This document currently exposes detailed vulnerability
artifacts (file paths, snippets) — do not keep those details in the public repo;
instead move each finding into a private GitHub Security Advisory and create
corresponding internal Issues for tracking. Remove or redact the sensitive
content from SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md (replace with a high‑level summary stating
that vulnerabilities were privately reported and are being tracked) and open
private advisories for the items referencing server/routes/git.js,
server/middleware/auth.js, src/components/PRDEditor.jsx, and
server/database/db.js; link each advisory to a non-public Issue for the patch
work and ensure any commits replacing the detailed content do not reintroduce
file paths or exploit code.
- Around line 1-88: The audit report file SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md is written in
Chinese but the project documentation language is English; update the document
by translating all sections (Execution Summary, Findings, Recommendations, issue
entries like "命令注入漏洞", "硬编码 JWT 密钥", etc.) into clear English and either replace
the Chinese content or add a parallel English version (e.g., append an "English"
section or create SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.en.md), ensuring unique identifiers from
the diff such as the headings for "🔴 严重问题 (需立即修复)" and each numbered issue
(e.g., "1. 命令注入漏洞 (CRITICAL)") are preserved in the translation so reviewers can
map findings back to the original; keep formatting, tables, code snippets (like
the git exec examples and file references server/routes/git.js,
server/middleware/auth.js, src/components/PRDEditor.jsx, server/database/db.js)
intact and update links/references if you create a new file.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md`:
- Line 1: Move the SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md out of the repository root into
docs/security/ (i.e., create docs/security/ and place SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md
there), update any references to this file (README, CONTRIBUTING, docs index, CI
workflows, or links) to point to docs/security/SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md, and
ensure repository navigation (mkdocs/site config or other docs tooling) includes
the new path so the report remains discoverable.
| # 项目全面审计报告 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 执行摘要 | ||
|
|
||
| | 审计类型 | 严重问题 | 中等问题 | 轻微问题 | 总计 | | ||
| |----------|----------|----------|----------|------| | ||
| | 安全审计 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | | ||
| | Bug查找 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 15 | | ||
| | 代码质量 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 16 | | ||
| | 性能分析 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 | | ||
| | **总计** | **12** | **24** | **19** | **55** | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No GitHub Issues linked for any of the 55 reported findings.
Contributing.md requires PRs to "reference issue numbers" and "link related issues." A security audit report that doesn't link to tracking issues provides no accountability or remediation workflow — findings become stale documentation with no owner.
For each critical and major finding, a corresponding GitHub Issue (or private Security Advisory, per the comment above) should be created and referenced here before this report is merged.
As per coding guidelines: "reference issue numbers, describe how to reproduce bugs".
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md` around lines 1 - 11, The audit report currently
lists 55 findings but contains no linked GitHub Issues or Security Advisories;
create GitHub Issues or private Security Advisories for each critical and major
finding, include issue numbers and links in SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md adjacent to
each finding in the table/sections (e.g., next to the rows under “审计类型”/“严重问题”),
and for each linked issue add severity, reproducible steps, owner, and
remediation ETA so the report meets the Contributing.md requirement to
"reference issue numbers" and "link related issues" before merging.
| # 项目全面审计报告 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 执行摘要 | ||
|
|
||
| | 审计类型 | 严重问题 | 中等问题 | 轻微问题 | 总计 | | ||
| |----------|----------|----------|----------|------| | ||
| | 安全审计 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | | ||
| | Bug查找 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 15 | | ||
| | 代码质量 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 16 | | ||
| | 性能分析 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 | | ||
| | **总计** | **12** | **24** | **19** | **55** | | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🔴 严重问题 (需立即修复) | ||
|
|
||
| ### 1. 命令注入漏洞 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/routes/git.js 多处 | ||
|
|
||
| **危险代码示例**: | ||
| ```javascript | ||
| await execAsync(`git commit -m "${message}"`) // 第379行 | ||
| await execAsync(`git status --porcelain "${file}"`) // 第205行 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 改用 spawnAsync + 参数数组 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 2. 硬编码 JWT 密钥 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/middleware/auth.js:6 | ||
|
|
||
| ```javascript | ||
| const JWT_SECRET = process.env.JWT_SECRET || | ||
| 'claude-ui-dev-secret-change-in-production' | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 生产环境必须设置 JWT_SECRET 环境变量 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 3. JWT Token 永不过期 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/middleware/auth.js:69-79 | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 添加 `{ expiresIn: '24h' }` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 4. XSS 漏洞 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: src/components/PRDEditor.jsx:492-504 | ||
|
|
||
| **问题**: Markdown 解析器未转义 HTML，用户输入可执行恶意脚本 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 5. 凭据明文存储 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/database/db.js:196-267 | ||
|
|
||
| **问题**: API 密钥、GitHub Token 以明文存储 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🟡 重大问题 | ||
|
|
||
| | 问题 | 位置 | 类型 | | ||
| |------|------|------| | ||
| | 巨型文件 (index.js 1930行) | server/ | 代码质量 | | ||
| | 零测试覆盖 | src/, server/ | 测试 | | ||
| | 路径遍历漏洞 | server/routes/commands.js:466-477 | 安全 | | ||
| | 异步未 await | server/routes/agent.js:886 | Bug | | ||
| | WebSocket JSON 解析无错误处理 | server/index.js:929-1040 | Bug | | ||
| | Projects Watcher 启动失败无捕获 | server/index.js:1921-1922 | Bug | | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🟢 建议改进 | ||
|
|
||
| - 添加数据库索引优化查询性能 | ||
| - 前端 WebSocket 消息添加节流 | ||
| - React 组件使用 React.memo | ||
| - 大文件读取使用流式处理 | ||
| - 使用结构化日志替代 console.log | ||
| - 移除代码中的 Emoji |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Document should be written in English to match the project's documentation language.
The entire report is in Chinese (Simplified), while all project documentation (Contributing.md, README, PR descriptions) is in English. This limits accessibility for the wider contributor base.
If an English version is intended downstream, consider adding it now alongside or instead of the Chinese text.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md` around lines 1 - 88, The audit report file
SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md is written in Chinese but the project documentation
language is English; update the document by translating all sections (Execution
Summary, Findings, Recommendations, issue entries like "命令注入漏洞", "硬编码 JWT 密钥",
etc.) into clear English and either replace the Chinese content or add a
parallel English version (e.g., append an "English" section or create
SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.en.md), ensuring unique identifiers from the diff such as
the headings for "🔴 严重问题 (需立即修复)" and each numbered issue (e.g., "1. 命令注入漏洞
(CRITICAL)") are preserved in the translation so reviewers can map findings back
to the original; keep formatting, tables, code snippets (like the git exec
examples and file references server/routes/git.js, server/middleware/auth.js,
src/components/PRDEditor.jsx, server/database/db.js) intact and update
links/references if you create a new file.
| ### 1. 命令注入漏洞 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/routes/git.js 多处 | ||
|
|
||
| **危险代码示例**: | ||
| ```javascript | ||
| await execAsync(`git commit -m "${message}"`) // 第379行 | ||
| await execAsync(`git status --porcelain "${file}"`) // 第205行 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 改用 spawnAsync + 参数数组 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 2. 硬编码 JWT 密钥 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/middleware/auth.js:6 | ||
|
|
||
| ```javascript | ||
| const JWT_SECRET = process.env.JWT_SECRET || | ||
| 'claude-ui-dev-secret-change-in-production' | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 生产环境必须设置 JWT_SECRET 环境变量 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 3. JWT Token 永不过期 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/middleware/auth.js:69-79 | ||
|
|
||
| **修复建议**: 添加 `{ expiresIn: '24h' }` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 4. XSS 漏洞 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: src/components/PRDEditor.jsx:492-504 | ||
|
|
||
| **问题**: Markdown 解析器未转义 HTML，用户输入可执行恶意脚本 | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### 5. 凭据明文存储 (CRITICAL) | ||
|
|
||
| **位置**: server/database/db.js:196-267 | ||
|
|
||
| **问题**: API 密钥、GitHub Token 以明文存储 | ||
|
|
||
| --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do not publicly commit unpatched vulnerability details — use GitHub Security Advisories instead.
This section documents 5 CRITICAL unresolved vulnerabilities with exact file paths, line numbers, and vulnerable code snippets (command injection, hardcoded JWT secret, JWT non-expiry, XSS, plaintext credential storage). Committing this to a public repository before fixes are in place is a responsible disclosure violation — it hands adversaries a ready-made exploit map.
The correct workflow:
- Use GitHub's private Security Advisory feature (Settings → Security → Advisories → New draft) to track each finding privately until patches are merged.
- Publish the advisory only after corresponding fixes land.
If the intent is to track these as regular work items, create individual GitHub Issues (not a public document exposing vulnerability specifics) and implement the fixes before or alongside disclosure.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md` around lines 17 - 66, This document currently
exposes detailed vulnerability artifacts (file paths, snippets) — do not keep
those details in the public repo; instead move each finding into a private
GitHub Security Advisory and create corresponding internal Issues for tracking.
Remove or redact the sensitive content from SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md (replace
with a high‑level summary stating that vulnerabilities were privately reported
and are being tracked) and open private advisories for the items referencing
server/routes/git.js, server/middleware/auth.js, src/components/PRDEditor.jsx,
and server/database/db.js; link each advisory to a non-public Issue for the
patch work and ensure any commits replacing the detailed content do not
reintroduce file paths or exploit code.
1 participant
Summary
This PR adds a comprehensive security and code audit report identifying 55 issues across the codebase:
Critical Security Issues (5)
Major Issues (6)
Recommendations
Test Plan
Generated by Claude Code Security Audit
Summary by CodeRabbit