Skip to content

Conversation

@rgknox
Copy link

@rgknox rgknox commented Jan 16, 2026

This fates side PR is paired with ctsm side PR slevis-lmwg/ctsm#19

Copy link
Owner

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rgknox this looks good to me. I can approve when we resolve my two questions.

Comment on lines -39 to +40
use PRTGenericMod, only : fates_cnp
use PRTGenericMod, only : carbon_only
use PRTGenericMod, only : carbon_nitrogen_phosphorus
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here you added a use statement for carbon_only that does not get used. If you did that intentionally, I'm fine with it. Otherwise, I would delete the unnecessary line.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rgknox while you resolve the other one, pls see what you think about this comment as well, though this one is just a case of an unnecessary line, so no big deal if it stays.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...and once these comments are resolved, this PR can be merged.


! initialize some values
hlm_parteh_mode = fates_c_only
hlm_parteh_mode = carbon_nitrogen_phosphorus
Copy link
Owner

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This replacement is incorrect, unless the fates_c_only here was incorrect to begin with.

Copy link
Owner

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rgknox pls correct me if I'm wrong: I think you said you would address this one, so I will wait.

@slevis-lmwg

This comment was marked as resolved.

@slevis-lmwg

This comment was marked as outdated.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Owner

Though I also do not want to forget the two pending questions that I posted above:
#3 (comment)
#3 (comment)

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants