bump juno to v0.12.2 #525
bump juno to v0.12.2 #525
Conversation
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 2 to 3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](github/codeql-action@v2...v3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github/codeql-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [docker/setup-buildx-action](https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action) from 2.2.1 to 3.2.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/releases) - [Commits](docker/setup-buildx-action@8c0edbc...2b51285) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: docker/setup-buildx-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials](https://github.com/aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials) from 1.7.0 to 4.0.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@67fbcbb...e3dd6a4) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [docker/build-push-action](https://github.com/docker/build-push-action) from 3.2.0 to 5.3.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/releases) - [Commits](docker/build-push-action@c56af95...2cdde99) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: docker/build-push-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
gauntlet: add DEPLOY_ACCOUNT action
* deploying a fresh l2 feed before each starknet validator test * adds explicity tx.wait() calls * updates comment * reusing l2 uptime feed
* debug logs * publickey is for nonce manager, not contract address * add skip validate to estimate * change tag to pending * make deep copy in txstore * deep copy fix * set x-apikey option for juno rpc * fix bug * add api key in few places * fix debug err * log * tidy up logging * remove nonce tracking from txstore * clean up deep copy * remove test
* adjust token amount + add exp timer * add back skip_validate flag * modify config
# Conflicts: # integration-tests/go.mod # integration-tests/go.sum
upgrade ctf
jmank88
had a problem deploying
to
integration
GitHub Actions
Failure
jmank88
had a problem deploying
to
integration
GitHub Actions
Failure
jmank88
had a problem deploying
to
integration
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
Thanks, is this just cause? Or is there some dependency in the core that requires this bump |
I was hoping this would have a cascading effect that fixes the sourcegraph issues, but starknet.go is not compatible with this version anyways. |
|
@jmank88 Nethermind recently made a code change to update starknet.go based off our request to bump juno. They said it'll be released in their next version |
|
Updated to the latest starknet.go version, but now this forces us to upgrade geth, so we're blocked on smartcontractkit/chainlink#11809. |
|
chray-zhang
force-pushed
the
bump-juno
branch
from
4d70695 to
6d57319
Compare
|
Why was this closed? Please re-open @chray-zhang |
|
I accidentally erased some of chainlink-starknet's origin history. Do you have a local branch you can force push up? If not I created a new PR with your commit: #555 Can you let me know if that's the change? |
That is probably good enough 👍 |
21 participants
No description provided.