Topic: Looking for help: Dimensions of profile matrices do not match ! #400
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi, I think something went wrong here, can you close |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## XChromatograms #400 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage 49.17% 49.17%
===============================================
Files 79 79
Lines 19731 19731
===============================================
Hits 9702 9702
Misses 10029 10029 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
- Export `Param` class. - Don't drop initial feature definitions in the `featureDefinitions<-` method allowing to add additional columns to this data frame.
- The `filterFile` method gains parameter `keepFeatures` to force keeping correspondence result even due filtering by samples (files).
…d code not new expected behavior and type should be 'double' rather than 'numeric'
- `featureChromatograms` gets parameters `n` and `value` to extract EICs from only the top n samples with highest intensities. - Add related unit tests and documentation.
- Add `normalize,Chromatogram` and `normalize,Chromatograms` to normalize intensities in a chromatogram object. - Add related documentation and unit tests.
PR to resolve issue #464 by fixing group matrix type
- Fix issue in conversion from `XCMSnExp` to `xcmsSet` ensuring that a phenodata `data.frame` will **always** be set. Thanks to Andris Jankevics for reporting.
Several updates, fixes etc
- Improve performance of splitting of objects for paralle processing. - Should improve the speed of `findChromPeaks`, `refineChromPeaks`, `chromPeakSpectra` and `reconstructChromPeakSpectra`.
- Further improve splitting an `XCMSnExp` object by file by first splitting the chrom peak data. - Use `extractROWS` instead of `[` for `DataFrame`.
- Small update to refineChromPeaks to use bplapply instead of bpmapply.
[DOC] Replace links to MassSpecWavelet::sav.gol() with links to peakDetectionCWT()
- Fix problem with `fillChromPeaks` after `MatchedFilterParam` peak detection on very sparse data (i.e. data with many empty spectra).
Fix problem in fillChromPeaks with sparse data
Change rgl.* to *3d
- Reimplement the `reconstructChromPeakSpectra` function for DIA data analysis to fix an issue with chrom peaks in overlapping isolation windows for SWATH data and to generally improve performance.
Improve performance for SWATH/DIA data analysis
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey ,
I met some problem in using XC MS, I can not fix by myself now. I am looking for help in here.
I divided my samples(650 samples) into two sub groups named mock and treatment and then put them into one folder to run XCMS.
When I run mock(325 samples) independently, the XC MS runs well and it works fine for me.
When I run treatment(325 samples) independently, the the XC MS also runs well.
However, when I run mock and treatment samples(650 samples) together, the XC MS shows error as follows:
Control0h_L1-50_BD7_01_38715 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-51_BE7_01_38716 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-52_BF7_01_38717 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-53_BG7_01_38718 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-54_BH7_01_38719 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-55_BA8_01_38720 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-56_BB8_01_38721 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-57_BC8_01_38722 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-58_BD8_01_38723 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-59_BE8_01_38724 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Control0h_L1-6_BG1_01_38666 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Found gaps: cut scantime-vector at 1399.01 seconds
Control0h_L1-60_BF8_01_38725 Create profile matrix with method 'bin' and step 0.1 ... OK
Error in .local(object, ...) :
Dimensions of profile matrices do not match !
Error in group(xset2, method = "density", mzwid = 0.01, sleep = 0.001, :
object 'xset2' not found
Many thanks for you in advance!