Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding changes to accommodate new snappi model #16148

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

selldinesh
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Summary:The apis for traffic and capture operations have been chnaged in the latest snappi model, this PR accommodates those changes
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

Modified traffic and capture related apis to the new snappi model

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

CLA Missing ID CLA Not Signed

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@sdszhang sdszhang requested a review from developfast December 18, 2024 23:22
@sdszhang
Copy link
Contributor

Please add a README for the steps, and requried Ixnetwork version.

@developfast can you review?

@developfast
Copy link
Contributor

Which version is this?

Copy link
Contributor

@developfast developfast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

putting a hold on this as it may break our internal testing - to verify which version of snappi this is

@sdszhang
Copy link
Contributor

sdszhang commented Mar 5, 2025

putting a hold on this as it may break our internal testing - to verify which version of snappi this is

Hi @developfast , how do we procced further on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants