Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[202405] Add ERR log ignore for ECMP/LAG hash not supported #16165

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 202405
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justin-wong-ce
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Summary:
On Broadcom platforms, ECMP/LAG hash is not supported. Adding ERR log ignore as it is expected for this error log to print.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

On Broadcom platforms, ECMP/LAG hash is not supported. Adding ERR log ignore as it is expected for this error log to print.

How did you do it?

Add by extending log regex in individual test cases. Not adding to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt because that would cause expected fail tests to pass during CI.

How did you verify/test it?

The following tests no longer fail on 7060X6 t1
snmp/test_snmp_queue_counters.py
drop_packets/drop_packets.py
bgp/test_bgp_bbr_default_state.py

Any platform specific information?

Only applies to Broadcom platform.

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

On Broadcom platforms, ECMP/LAG hash is not supported. Adding ERR log
ignore as it is expected for this error log to print.

Add by extending log regex in individual test cases. Not adding to
loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt because that would cause expected fail
tests to pass during CI.
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants