Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add VRF support to ZMQ server/client #920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor

@liuh-80 liuh-80 commented Sep 24, 2024

Why I did it

Orchagent failed bind to ZMQ when mgmt VRF enabled: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19638

How I did it

Add VRF support to ZMQ server/client.

Work item tracking

How to verify it

Pass all test cases.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111

Description for the changelog

Add VRF support to ZMQ server/client.

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@qiluo-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Could you add testcase and ensure new code is covered in test?

@liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor Author

liuh-80 commented Sep 26, 2024

/azpw run Azure.sonic-swss-common

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-swss-common

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor Author

liuh-80 commented Sep 29, 2024

/azpw run Azure.sonic-swss-common

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-swss-common

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@liuh-80 liuh-80 merged commit 898aa5d into sonic-net:master Sep 30, 2024
17 checks passed
divyagayathri-hcl pushed a commit to divyagayathri-hcl/sonic-swss-common that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants