removing error array dimension from TicaCubeFactory

[hmlewis-astro]

Addressing ticket ASB-22318. Created a test cube using 500 FFIs from TICA Sector 67, cam1-ccd1. Created cube has expected dimensions, see output from fitsinfo below. Cube created without error array is ~1/2 the size of a cube created with the error array (8.68 vs 17.35 GB).

Filename: /home/halewis/hlsp/tica/tica_cubes/s0067/tica-s0067-1-1-cube.fits
No.    Name      Ver    Type      Cards   Dimensions   Format
 0  PRIMARY       1 PrimaryHDU     198   ()      
 1                1 ImageHDU         9   (1, 500, 2136, 2078)   float32   
 2                1 BinTableHDU    598   500R x 198C   [D, J, J, J, J, D, J, J, 2A, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, J, J, J, J, J, J, J, D, J, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, 3A, J, J, 16A, D, D, D, D, 9A, 5A, D, 15A, 4A, 4A, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, 12A, 12A, D, D, D, D, J, J, J, J, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, D, J, J, J, 16A, 10A, 49A, 64A]

[jaymedina]

This is looking good! I added a commit to update the test_make_cube unit test for TicaCubeFactory, and I'm going to run some tests on my Jupyter NB, but apart from that, this PR is almost ready to go. Something within the scope of this PR is a documentation upgrade to reflect your changes: Would you mind going into the Astrocut docs and modifying this page in particular with a breakdown of the TICA cube file format now that it deviates from the SPOC cubes? TICA was due for it's own section anyway because some of the header keywords are analogous but not exactly the same.

[jaymedina]

I ran some tests in a Jupyter notebook (see Jira ticket for step 2. in the Error Array Epic) and all looks fine. I've also rebased my CutoutFactory changes (#88) onto the changes in this branch, and the CI tests are passing again, so all is looking good.

In a previous comment, I'd asked to update the documentation, but my changes in #88 also need to be reflected in the documentation, so it's best to have the documentation update be its own PR so that it's more self-contained. I've made a Jira ticket for this task, it's step 3.5. I'm happy to take it on after I worked on some of my other tasks for this sprint.