Add permission to write comments

[a-nomad]

Add permission to pipeline to write to itself

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration to enhance CI/CD infrastructure permissions for pull request handling.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a top-level permissions block to the GitHub Actions code-quality workflow to explicitly grant write access for pull requests, enabling workflow tasks to modify pull request state.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions workflow permissions .github/workflows/code-quality.yml	Added top-level permissions block granting pull-requests: write access to the workflow

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single-file configuration change with no functional impact on existing workflow steps
• Straightforward permissions assignment following GitHub Actions best practices

Possibly related PRs

• Add code quality workflow for linting on pull requests and main branc… #1: Introduced the initial .github/workflows/code-quality.yml workflow file; this PR adds permissions configuration to that workflow.

Suggested reviewers

• killev

Poem

🐰 A permissions block so neat,
Makes the workflow complete,
Pull requests now have their say,
Write access lights the way! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "Add permission to write comments" is directly related to the main change, which adds a permissions block to the GitHub Actions workflow file to grant write access. The title accurately reflects the core intent of the changeset—adding permissions—and is specific enough to convey meaningful information without being generic or vague. While the title could be more precise by explicitly mentioning GitHub Actions or the workflow context, it successfully communicates the primary change and would help teammates scanning the history understand what was modified.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/add-permission

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

🔍 Vulnerabilities of temporal-test:latest

📦 Image Reference temporal-test:latest

digest	sha256:17e54ff5e9a181d1bdbf7334ce9637f9c3934d54a65427ae36a5743f46487f15
vulnerabilities
platform	linux/amd64
size	218 MB
packages	358

📦 Base Image alpine:3

also known as	3.21 3.21.3 latest
digest	sha256:1c4eef651f65e2f7daee7ee785882ac164b02b78fb74503052a26dc061c90474
vulnerabilities

stdlib 1.23.2 (golang) pkg:golang/stdlib@1.23.2 Affected range <1.23.8 Fixed version 1.23.8 EPSS Score 0.017% EPSS Percentile 3rd percentile Description The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server is used in conjunction with a server that incorrectly accepts a bare LF as part of a chunk-ext.

stdlib 1.23.6 (golang) pkg:golang/stdlib@1.23.6 Affected range <1.23.8 Fixed version 1.23.8 EPSS Score 0.017% EPSS Percentile 3rd percentile Description The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server is used in conjunction with a server that incorrectly accepts a bare LF as part of a chunk-ext.

curl 8.12.1-r0 (apk) pkg:apk/alpine/curl@8.12.1-r0?os_name=alpine&os_version=3.21 Affected range <8.14.1-r2 Fixed version 8.14.1-r2 EPSS Score 0.077% EPSS Percentile 24th percentile Description Affected range <8.14.1-r0 Fixed version 8.14.1-r0 EPSS Score 0.065% EPSS Percentile 21st percentile Description

golang.org/x/oauth2 0.26.0 (golang) pkg:golang/golang.org/x/oauth2@0.26.0 Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input Affected range <0.27.0 Fixed version 0.27.0 CVSS Score 7.5 CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H EPSS Score 0.091% EPSS Percentile 27th percentile Description An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.

github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 4.5.1 (golang) pkg:golang/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt@4.5.1#v4 Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) Affected range <4.5.2 Fixed version 4.5.2 CVSS Score 8.7 CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N EPSS Score 0.055% EPSS Percentile 17th percentile Description Summary Function parse.ParseUnverified currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. Relevant weakness: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) Details See parse.ParseUnverified Impact Excessive memory allocation

golang.org/x/crypto 0.32.0 (golang) pkg:golang/golang.org/x/crypto@0.32.0 Affected range <0.35.0 Fixed version 0.35.0 EPSS Score 0.242% EPSS Percentile 47th percentile Description SSH servers which implement file transfer protocols are vulnerable to a denial of service attack from clients which complete the key exchange slowly, or not at all, causing pending content to be read into memory, but never transmitted.

c-ares 1.34.3-r0 (apk) pkg:apk/alpine/c-ares@1.34.3-r0?os_name=alpine&os_version=3.21 Affected range <1.34.5-r0 Fixed version 1.34.5-r0 EPSS Score 0.123% EPSS Percentile 32nd percentile Description

openssl 3.3.3-r0 (apk) pkg:apk/alpine/openssl@3.3.3-r0?os_name=alpine&os_version=3.21 Affected range <3.3.5-r0 Fixed version 3.3.5-r0 EPSS Score 0.026% EPSS Percentile 6th percentile Description

go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc 0.36.4 (golang) pkg:golang/go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation@0.36.4#google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc Affected range <0.46.0 Fixed version 0.46.0 EPSS Score 3.585% EPSS Percentile 87th percentile Description The grpc Unary Server Interceptor created by the otelgrpc package added the labels net.peer.sock.addr and net.peer.sock.port with unbounded cardinality. This can lead to the server's potential memory exhaustion when many malicious requests are sent. This leads to a denial-of-service.

golang.org/x/oauth2 0.7.0 (golang) pkg:golang/golang.org/x/oauth2@0.7.0 Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input Affected range <0.27.0 Fixed version 0.27.0 CVSS Score 7.5 CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H EPSS Score 0.091% EPSS Percentile 27th percentile Description An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.

github.com/golang-jwt/jwt 3.2.2+incompatible (golang) pkg:golang/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt@3.2.2%2Bincompatible Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) Affected range >=3.2.0 <=3.2.2 Fixed version Not Fixed CVSS Score 8.7 CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N EPSS Score 0.055% EPSS Percentile 17th percentile Description Summary Function parse.ParseUnverified currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. Relevant weakness: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) Details See parse.ParseUnverified Impact Excessive memory allocation

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

10-11: LGTM! Consider scoping permissions to the job level.

The permissions block correctly enables the docker-scout job's write-comment: true feature (line 95). However, for better adherence to the principle of least privilege, consider moving the pull-requests: write permission to only the docker-scout job since the other jobs (lint, sonarqube, hadolint, service-check) don't require write access.

Optional refactor: Move permissions to the docker-scout job level

-permissions:
-  pull-requests: write
-
 jobs:
   lint:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
@@ -52,6 +48,8 @@ jobs:
   docker-scout:
     name: Docker Security Scanning
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      pull-requests: write
     needs: hadolint

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9b7191 and 4c7cc8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (n8n, Dockerfile.n8n, n8n-test:latest)
• GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (temporal, Dockerfile.temporal, temporal-test:latest)
• GitHub Check: Service Availability Check

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[anatolyshipitz]

Optional (not critical): The current implementation grants pull-requests: write permission at the workflow level, which means all jobs (lint, sonarqube, hadolint, docker-scout, service-check) inherit this permission.

However, only the docker-scout job actually needs write access to post comments

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud