[764] fix/Link to prod should not contain http://www.

[VitalyyP]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

🔍 Vulnerabilities of apostrophe-cms:test

📦 Image Reference apostrophe-cms:test

digest	sha256:f5b066d95c722aee13974bba0d66e078d3876d1152f240e34bdeb8628acdeec1
vulnerabilities
platform	linux/amd64
size	291 MB
packages	984

📦 Base Image node:23-alpine

also known as	23-alpine3.22 23.11-alpine 23.11-alpine3.22 23.11.1-alpine 23.11.1-alpine3.22
digest	sha256:b9d38d589853406ff0d4364f21969840c3e0397087643aef8eede40edbb6c7cd
vulnerabilities

form-data 4.0.2 (npm) pkg:npm/form-data@4.0.2 Use of Insufficiently Random Values Affected range >=4.0.0 <4.0.4 Fixed version 4.0.4 CVSS Score 9.4 CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N EPSS Score 0.076% EPSS Percentile 23rd percentile Description Summary form-data uses Math.random() to select a boundary value for multipart form-encoded data. This can lead to a security issue if an attacker: can observe other values produced by Math.random in the target application, and can control one field of a request made using form-data Because the values of Math.random() are pseudo-random and predictable (see: https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f), an attacker who can observe a few sequential values can determine the state of the PRNG and predict future values, includes those used to generate form-data's boundary value. The allows the attacker to craft a value that contains a boundary value, allowing them to inject additional parameters into the request. This is largely the same vulnerability as was recently found in undici by parrot409 -- I'm not affiliated with that researcher but want to give credit where credit is due! My PoC is largely based on their work. Details The culprit is this line here: https://github.com/form-data/form-data/blob/426ba9ac440f95d1998dac9a5cd8d738043b048f/lib/form_data.js#L347 An attacker who is able to predict the output of Math.random() can predict this boundary value, and craft a payload that contains the boundary value, followed by another, fully attacker-controlled field. This is roughly equivalent to any sort of improper escaping vulnerability, with the caveat that the attacker must find a way to observe other Math.random() values generated by the application to solve for the state of the PRNG. However, Math.random() is used in all sorts of places that might be visible to an attacker (including by form-data itself, if the attacker can arrange for the vulnerable application to make a request to an attacker-controlled server using form-data, such as a user-controlled webhook -- the attacker could observe the boundary values from those requests to observe the Math.random() outputs). A common example would be a x-request-id header added by the server. These sorts of headers are often used for distributed tracing, to correlate errors across the frontend and backend. Math.random() is a fine place to get these sorts of IDs (in fact, opentelemetry uses Math.random for this purpose) PoC PoC here: https://github.com/benweissmann/CVE-2025-7783-poc Instructions are in that repo. It's based on the PoC from https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312 but simplified somewhat; the vulnerable application has a more direct side-channel from which to observe Math.random() values (a separate endpoint that happens to include a randomly-generated request ID). Impact For an application to be vulnerable, it must: Use form-data to send data including user-controlled data to some other system. The attacker must be able to do something malicious by adding extra parameters (that were not intended to be user-controlled) to this request. Depending on the target system's handling of repeated parameters, the attacker might be able to overwrite values in addition to appending values (some multipart form handlers deal with repeats by overwriting values instead of representing them as an array) Reveal values of Math.random(). It's easiest if the attacker can observe multiple sequential values, but more complex math could recover the PRNG state to some degree of confidence with non-sequential values. If an application is vulnerable, this allows an attacker to make arbitrary requests to internal systems.

linkifyjs 4.2.0 (npm) pkg:npm/linkifyjs@4.2.0 Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') Affected range <4.3.2 Fixed version 4.3.2 CVSS Score 8.8 CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N EPSS Score 0.060% EPSS Percentile 19th percentile Description Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') vulnerability in Linkify (linkifyjs) allows XSS Targeting HTML Attributes and Manipulating User-Controlled Variables.This issue affects Linkify: from 4.3.1 before 4.3.2.

async 1.5.2 (npm) pkg:npm/async@1.5.2 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities Affected range <2.6.4 Fixed version 2.6.4, 3.2.2 CVSS Score 7.8 CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H EPSS Score 0.907% EPSS Percentile 75th percentile Description A vulnerability exists in Async through 3.2.1 (fixed in 3.2.2), which could let a malicious user obtain privileges via the mapValues() method.

async 0.9.2 (npm) pkg:npm/async@0.9.2 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities Affected range <2.6.4 Fixed version 2.6.4, 3.2.2 CVSS Score 7.8 CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H EPSS Score 0.907% EPSS Percentile 75th percentile Description A vulnerability exists in Async through 3.2.1 (fixed in 3.2.2), which could let a malicious user obtain privileges via the mapValues() method.

connect-multiparty 2.2.0 (npm) pkg:npm/connect-multiparty@2.2.0 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Affected range <=2.2.0 Fixed version Not Fixed CVSS Score 7.8 CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H EPSS Score 0.320% EPSS Percentile 54th percentile Description An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the file upload module of Express Connect-Multiparty 2.2.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file. NOTE: the Supplier has not verified this vulnerability report.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

• Reflowed formatting of the existing fullStoryUrl anchor (indentation/line breaks only).
• Added template logic to produce a cleaned display label for prodLink:
  • Remove leading "http://" or "https://", split on '/', take first segment, trim, and strip leading "www.".
  • Anchor href remains data.piece.prodLink; visible text uses the cleaned domain.
• Added rel="noopener noreferrer" to the prodLink anchor and an inline comment noting removal of path/query/fragment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~6 minutes

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ece698e and dc6c622.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: e2e-tests
• GitHub Check: unit-tests
• GitHub Check: lint
• GitHub Check: security-scan

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 764-fix/link-to-prod-should-not-contain-http-and-www

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html (1)

178-186: Confirm acceptance criteria: label vs href

Your change cleans the visible text (good) but keeps the original href (which may still include http:// and www.). The PR title says “Link to prod should not contain http://www.” — if this refers to the label, you’re done; if it refers to the actual href, you’ll need to normalize the URL target as well (e.g., enforce https and strip leading www.).

If href normalization is desired, consider:

• Enforcing https in the href when input is http (business-dependent).
• Stripping only a leading www. from the host, leaving subdomains intact.
• Handling protocol-relative URLs (//example.com/...).

I can provide a safe normalization function on the server side to avoid doing this in the template.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcb132f and ece698e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: yuramax
PR: speedandfunction/website#91
File: website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html:32-62
Timestamp: 2025-05-16T15:36:29.877Z
Learning: The "Read The Full Story" button in the case study details page currently uses a placeholder href="#" intentionally, as the final link destination is not yet ready. This is a temporary state during development.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: security-scan
• GitHub Check: e2e-tests
• GitHub Check: unit-tests
• GitHub Check: lint

🔇 Additional comments (1)

website/modules/case-studies-page/views/show.html (1)

171-176: LGTM: anchor reflow is fine

Only formatting/indentation changed; target and rel remain correct. No functional impact.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud