- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 714
Support abritrary epochs in TestChainstate #6619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Support abritrary epochs in TestChainstate #6619
Conversation
86e4e60    to
    58cee2e      
    Compare
  
    c3a3c2f    to
    c6ce521      
    Compare
  
    Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
c6ce521    to
    1eb48de      
    Compare
  
    … into feat/expand-consensus-test-to-support-pre-nakamoto-epochs
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
… into feat/expand-consensus-test-to-support-pre-nakamoto-epochs
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
…t to use all epochs GTE epoch 2.0 Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
… into feat/expand-consensus-test-to-support-pre-nakamoto-epochs
| Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is  ❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (68.99%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6619      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    61.40%   68.99%   +7.59%     
===========================================
  Files          574      574              
  Lines       354916   355501     +585     
===========================================
+ Hits        217939   245284   +27345     
+ Misses      136977   110217   -26760     
 ... and 328 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry. 
 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
 | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still need to finish the review of the changes in the consensus.rs file, but GREAT work!
        
          
                ...ts/snapshots/blockstack_lib__chainstate__tests__consensus__successfully_deploy_and_call.snap
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
      … into feat/expand-consensus-test-to-support-pre-nakamoto-epochs
…ion handling pre epoch 2.0 Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Replaces #6608