Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial XDR definitions for the parallel execution of tx sets. #192

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

dmkozh
Copy link
Contributor

@dmkozh dmkozh commented Jun 20, 2024

There were a few extension possibilities for the tx set; I've chosen extending the phase after experimenting with the implementation. Introducing e.g. a new component is not necessarily wrong, but that does make the tx set building and validation unnecessarily cumbersome. I also don't anticipate allowing multiple parallel components at this moment; even if we want to allow multiple base fees, these should go into the internal structure as the current structure controls the application order.

There were a few extension possibilities for the tx set; I've chosen extending the phase after experimenting with the implementation. Introducing e.g. a new component is not necessarily wrong, but that does make the tx set building and validation unnecessarily cumbersome. I also don't anticipate allowing multiple parallel components at this moment; even if we want to allow multiple base fees, these should go into the internal structure as the current structure controls the application order.
@dmkozh dmkozh enabled auto-merge (squash) June 21, 2024 15:26
@dmkozh dmkozh merged commit 248090e into stellar:next Jun 21, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants