Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable hermetic builds #380

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Enable hermetic builds #380

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

dhaiducek
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@dhaiducek dhaiducek force-pushed the dhaiduce-main-hermetic branch 10 times, most recently from 4826919 to 8782f66 Compare January 14, 2025 21:40
@dhaiducek dhaiducek force-pushed the dhaiduce-main-hermetic branch 2 times, most recently from 56e32cd to 2bbe563 Compare January 16, 2025 01:17
Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <[email protected]>
@dhaiducek dhaiducek force-pushed the dhaiduce-main-hermetic branch from 2bbe563 to 4e0ec67 Compare January 16, 2025 19:02
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhaiducek, JustinKuli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dhaiducek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

@dhaiducek dhaiducek merged commit faef151 into main Jan 16, 2025
4 of 7 checks passed
@dhaiducek dhaiducek deleted the dhaiduce-main-hermetic branch January 16, 2025 21:25
@@ -134,24 +134,29 @@ if [ -z $GATHER_MCE_RAN ] || [ $GATHER_MCE_RAN != true ]; then
}

gather_service_and_event_logs_for_failed_agents() {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paul-maidment You were the author of the original code, so I wanted to get some feedback on this change we just merged. I'm not sure this block had been working since it leveraged yq, which isn't readily available as an RPM. I've re-flowed it in this PR to use jq with an oc get call instead. If you have a moment (and/or have a cluster you can send me via Slack to test it out), I'd appreciate if you'd verify the logic here. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants