Skip to content

Mc adaptive packet count #6456

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ffoucart
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Let the MC code choose adaptively the energy of packets, based on a desired total packet count. This currently allows for adaptivity in time, but does not use higher-energy packets in dense regions (this will be coded later).

Upgrade instructions

None

Code review checklist

  • The code is documented and the documentation renders correctly. Run
    make doc to generate the documentation locally into BUILD_DIR/docs/html.
    Then open index.html.
  • The code follows the stylistic and code quality guidelines listed in the
    code review guide.
  • The PR lists upgrade instructions and is labeled bugfix or
    new feature if appropriate.

Further comments

@ffoucart ffoucart added the dependent Needs a different PR to be merged in first label Jan 24, 2025
@ffoucart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Depends on #6403

@ffoucart ffoucart force-pushed the MCAdaptivePacketCount branch from f98054c to 6b506b8 Compare January 27, 2025 21:17
@ffoucart ffoucart force-pushed the MCAdaptivePacketCount branch from 6b506b8 to f31c593 Compare April 11, 2025 20:52
@ffoucart ffoucart removed the dependent Needs a different PR to be merged in first label Apr 11, 2025
@ffoucart ffoucart marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2025 20:57
@ffoucart ffoucart force-pushed the MCAdaptivePacketCount branch from f31c593 to aff4989 Compare April 14, 2025 19:21
@ffoucart ffoucart force-pushed the MCAdaptivePacketCount branch from aff4989 to c9838c2 Compare April 15, 2025 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant