-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AssetMapper] Upgrade importmap polyfill #57565
[AssetMapper] Upgrade importmap polyfill #57565
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's for 6.4 to me: infra-related stuff are bugfixes.
Not sure if we should backport this on 6.4 ?
d5145a2
to
385d1e8
Compare
Thank you @smnandre. |
private const DEFAULT_ES_MODULE_SHIMS_POLYFILL_URL = 'https://ga.jspm.io/npm:[email protected]/dist/es-module-shims.js'; | ||
// https://generator.jspm.io/#S2NnYGAIzSvJLMlJTWEAAMYOgCAOAA | ||
private const DEFAULT_ES_MODULE_SHIMS_POLYFILL_URL = 'https://ga.jspm.io/npm:[email protected]/dist/es-module-shims.js'; | ||
private const DEFAULT_ES_MODULE_SHIMS_POLYFILL_INTEGRITY = 'sha384-ie1x72Xck445i0j4SlNJ5W5iGeL3Dpa0zD48MZopgWsjNB/lt60SuG1iduZGNnJn'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The constant is not used anywhere, is it on purpose? Maybe a comment would have been enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's used on 7.1 so at least it's there for the merge up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, thanks :)
Not sure if we should backport this on 6.4 ?