Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More robust code & Support for network ports #1

Open
wants to merge 36 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

schuellerf
Copy link

Thank you for your great work so far!
Although it didn't work on my machine as it has no swap and only "virtual" drives - so I fixed that

Also I added support to query open ports and alert if new ports have been opened or closed
(service started/died)

Regards
Florian

@schuellerf schuellerf changed the title More robust & Network ports More robust code & Support for network ports Feb 8, 2017
@syxolk
Copy link
Owner

syxolk commented Feb 8, 2017

Hey, thanks for the good work. I will take a look at it tomorrow.

@schuellerf
Copy link
Author

Support for system services also went in as you can see :-D

@syxolk
Copy link
Owner

syxolk commented Feb 18, 2017

Hey, I'm pretty busy right now. But I will definitely merge it once I've had time to test it on my side.

@schuellerf
Copy link
Author

Just take your time, I'm not in a hurry ;-)

@jlsjonas
Copy link

@syxolk has your situation changed meanwhile? if not, looking at the commit history it might be interesting to add maintainers or mark it as no longer maintained pointing to @schuellerf's version (if (s)he is up for that.
The project looks very interesting!

@syxolk
Copy link
Owner

syxolk commented Apr 30, 2019

@jlsjonas I will try to look through this in the next days. I'm not sure if I want to maintain this because I'm not actively using it anymore.

@jlsjonas
Copy link

May i ask what you're using instead? Or are you no longer using servers directly anymore?
There's definitely some interesting alternatives but I'm not sure how nicely they integrate with Telegram :)

@syxolk
Copy link
Owner

syxolk commented Apr 30, 2019

Mostly UptimeRobot but that's not really comparable to be honest :)

I should probably start using this again 👍

@jlsjonas
Copy link

jlsjonas commented Apr 30, 2019

Indeed 😁
I rely on UptimeRobot too, for public-facing checks; doesn't help with discovering the underlying issues 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants