Prepare Pycryptopp for Crypto++ changes for byte #43
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The Crypto++ library is getting ready to change the scope of its definition for a byte. The short of it is, Crypto++ byte and C++17 std::byte can cause compile failures due to ambiguous resolutions; and the behavior of byte and std::byte are incompatible.
More information can be found at:
std::byte (https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Std::byte) on the Crypto++ wiki
Issue 442, Test C++17 byte change with dry runs from various projects (weidai11/cryptopp#442)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Crypto++ library is getting ready to change the scope of its definition for a byte. The short of it is, Crypto++ byte and C++17 std::byte can cause compile failures due to ambiguous resolutions; and the behavior of Crypto++ byte and std::byte are incompatible.
More information can be found at:
Also see Issue 42, Crypto++ and upcoming change for byte definition due to C++17