Skip to content

Conversation

@Jason2866
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

xieqinan and others added 30 commits September 23, 2025 17:10
(cherry picked from commit 4ae438c)

Co-authored-by: chenjianhua <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0b203ab)

Co-authored-by: zwl <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 810d7e0)

Co-authored-by: zwl <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 4d2d49f)

Co-authored-by: zwl <[email protected]>
* esp-openthread: thread_zigbee/esp-openthread@8ed1e7599
* openthread: espressif/openthread@3b3dd203b
* esp-idf: acefe20f1
(cherry picked from commit fd4bb69)

Co-authored-by: chenjianhua <[email protected]>
also change to shanghai runners
chore(mipi_dsi): checked the register on P4 ECO5

checked timg and etm registers
(cherry picked from commit 322eb33)

Co-authored-by: Zhou Xiao <[email protected]>
Isl2017 and others added 28 commits November 3, 2025 16:23
Added BLE Low Power Mode Introduction (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42994
fix(nimble): Address compilation issues in nimble examples (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42866
Disable peripheral powerdown lightsleep if PSRAM if enabled on P4 v3
Force powerdown Flash if peripheral power down lightsleep is enabled
esp32p4: temporarily disable target test (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43041
… into 'release/v5.4'

fix(http_server): Fixed response status code for temporary redirect (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43088
feat(esp_hw_support): update esp32p4 eco5 lowpower features support (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42943
feat(coex): add 802.15.4 status for coex (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42835
feat(usb/host): Add USB support to ESP32-P4 v3 (ECO5) (backport to v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42726
fix(rmt): fix pm lock type to increase stability (v5.4)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43047
@Jason2866 Jason2866 closed this Nov 6, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "bugfix(wifi): Improve FTM Query logging for AP-Sta mode":
    • type/action should be one of [change, ci, docs, feat, fix, refactor, remove, revert, test]
  • the commit message "chore(soc): checked P4-ECO5 regsiters for dw_gdma,timg,etm,dsi":
    • type/action should be one of [change, ci, docs, feat, fix, refactor, remove, revert, test]
  • the commit message "dma: fixed issue that DMA are not reset when CPU reset":
    • body's lines must not be longer than 100 characters
    • type/action should be one of [change, ci, docs, feat, fix, refactor, remove, revert, test]
  • the commit message "doc(temperature_sensor): Update temperature snesor docs, remove inaccurate part":
    • type/action should be one of [change, ci, docs, feat, fix, refactor, remove, revert, test]
  • the commit message "feat(soc):update lcd registers for esp32p4 rev3.0":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty
  • the commit message "fix(ble/bluedroid): fix memory leak during deinit when service table is created but not started":
    • summary appears to be too long
  • the commit message "p4: move hw ver1 registers":
    • type/action should be one of [change, ci, docs, feat, fix, refactor, remove, revert, test]

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

⚠️ Please consider squashing your 238 commits (simplifying branch history).
⚠️ The Pull Request description is empty. Please provide a detailed description.
⚠️
	The **target branch** for this Pull Request **must be the default branch** of the project (`master`).

	If you would like to add this feature to a different branch, please state this in the PR description and we will consider it.
Messages
📖 This PR seems to be quite large (total lines of code: 57208), you might consider splitting it into smaller PRs

👋 Hello Jason2866, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- Addressing info messages (📖) is strongly recommended; they're less critical but valuable.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 616ff58

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.