Skip to content

Conversation

@Jason2866
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

L-KAYA and others added 30 commits October 16, 2025 12:03
This commit adds fixes for freertos unit tests for a more deterministic
run and avoid occational failures.
Fix typos in NimBLE example comments (GitHub PR) (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43113
…ease/v5.3'

test(freertos): Added miscellaneous stability fixes to unit tests (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43125
…v5.3'

fix(802.15.4): fix line save in 154 debug (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43224
(cherry picked from commit 8e1292e)

Co-authored-by: cjin <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 658efa2)

Co-authored-by: cjin <[email protected]>
fix(bt/bluedroid): update the COD before enabling inquiry scan (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43239
(cherry picked from commit 3e0d005)

Co-authored-by: Zhou Xiao <[email protected]>
fix(bt/blurdoird): fixed an OOB write in bta_dm_sdp_result (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43205
…5.3' into 'release/v5.3'

fix(ble): increase default ble log stack size for xtensa chips (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43285
- Fixed Bluetooth hardware error of 'CHMAP_ERROR'
- Fixed encryption collision bug
fix(bt/bluedroid): Fixed HID memory leak (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43333
change(ble): [AUTO_MR] 20251106 - Update ESP BLE Controller Lib (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43172
fix(bt/controller): fixed Bluetooth hardware error of 'CHMAP_ERROR' (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43341
suda-morris and others added 28 commits November 18, 2025 17:16
…release/v5.3'

fix(gpio): fix USB DP pin unusable after CPU reset for S3/C3 (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42811
…D D/C

Adopts approach used by M5GFX that enables/diables output during SPI transaction.
fix(openthread): resolve deadlock issues due to switching_lock (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43480
fix (GitHub PR) (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43494
…'release/v5.3'

fix(i2s): fixed invalid offset in the big gap writing scenario (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!42754
fix(examples): fixed bridge example test endnode to host send (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43056
(cherry picked from commit 9bfd9c5)

Co-authored-by: zhanghaipeng <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2dcbd64)

Co-authored-by: zhanghaipeng <[email protected]>
…release/v5.3'

feat(bt): Add an SPP API parameter to indicate whether to create the SPP record(v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43586
fix(bt/examples): Fixed test_bt_l2cap not finding ESP_SDP_CREATE_RECORD_COMP_EVT (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43605
 - fix(ble): fixed BLE enable scan timeout
 - fix(ble): fixed crash in "btdm_controller_task"


(cherry picked from commit c5e50cc)

Co-authored-by: zhanghaipeng <[email protected]>
ci: pytest-ignore skip using dut id

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43627
…elease/v5.3'

fix(openthread): remove the duplicate macro definition (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43710
…ase/v5.3'

feat(openthread): Use PSRAM by default for OpenThread message buffers when PSRAM is enabled (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43716
…5.3'

feat(openthread): optimize fail cases in CI test (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43741
fix(nimble): Add a check for psync before processing (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43634
…v5.3'

Fixed scan HCI command timeout issue on ESP32 (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43688
fix(ble/bluedroid): Fixed BLE incorrect device record count issue (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43595
…into 'release/v5.3'

ci(parlio): fixed incorrect condition in rx test case (v5.3)

See merge request espressif/esp-idf!43797
@Jason2866 Jason2866 merged commit 58118d2 into tasmota:release/v5.3_orig Dec 1, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message " fix(bt): Update esp32 libbtdm_app.a (15a18b1a)":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty
  • the commit message "feat(openthread): Use PSRAM by default for OpenThread message buffers when PSRAM is enabled":
    • summary appears to be too long

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

⚠️ Please consider squashing your 68 commits (simplifying branch history).
⚠️ The Pull Request description is empty. Please provide a detailed description.
⚠️
	The **target branch** for this Pull Request **must be the default branch** of the project (`master`).

	If you would like to add this feature to a different branch, please state this in the PR description and we will consider it.
Messages
📖 This PR seems to be quite large (total lines of code: 1470), you might consider splitting it into smaller PRs

👋 Hello Jason2866, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- Addressing info messages (📖) is strongly recommended; they're less critical but valuable.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6949294

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.