-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 514
Add tests for Joint Iteration proposal + split tests #4609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
test/built-ins/Iterator/zip/iterables-iteration-after-reading-options.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/built-ins/Iterator/zipKeyed/results-object-has-default-attributes.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/built-ins/Iterator/zipKeyed/iterables-iteration-get-abrupt-completion.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
michaelficarra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM otherwise! Looks like this fully covers the test plan and then some. Thanks again @anba for writing these tests.
|
FYI I've confirmed the latest diff with the polyfill from the proposal repo and it still passes. |
|
This was written by someone involved in the implementation and reviewed by two proposal champions. I would be comfortable to merge it now, to avoid holding it up any further. I would prefer that in the future we are more strict with the "mini-polyfill" stuff but I personally won't have the bandwidth to propose an alternative, nor review the rest of the PR, in the near future. @gibson042 @ljharb @Ms2ger What do you think? |
|
I would be okay with that. |
This is all of the commits from #4528 plus one additional one to split tests per maintainer request there.