Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct typo in multiple data block example #67

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

huwjenkins
Copy link
Contributor

The multiple data block example in the documentation mistakenly refers to an argument force_dict when this is always_dict:

To force returning a dectionary even when only one datablock is present set
`always_dict=True`.

always_dict: bool
Always return a dictionary, even when only a single data block is present.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.73%. Comparing base (5b19406) to head (97e069b).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #67      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.93%   82.73%   +1.80%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         278      307      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits          225      254      +29     
  Misses         53       53              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@alisterburt
Copy link
Member

Great catch @huwjenkins - thank you for the PR!

@alisterburt alisterburt merged commit a2e9927 into teamtomo:main Sep 13, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants