Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Writing test logic for authentication #76

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
May 11, 2024
Merged

Writing test logic for authentication #76

merged 19 commits into from
May 11, 2024

Conversation

YuuDaRealest
Copy link
Contributor

@YuuDaRealest YuuDaRealest commented May 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated authentication and registration test cases to use new success and failure response types for improved clarity and consistency.
  • Tests
    • Enhanced testing libraries to support new response types, aiding in more robust and reliable test scenarios.
  • Documentation
    • Clarified usage of success and failure types in test documentation to assist developers in writing and understanding tests.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates across several test files in the mobile app's authentication feature involve a shift from using right and left to OK and Failure respectively, reflecting a new approach in handling success and error states. This change aligns with the introduction of the ddd_core package, which redefines these states to enhance clarity and maintainability in code testing scenarios.

Changes

Files Changes
.../forgot_password_cubit_test.dart
.../login_form_bloc_test.dart
- Added ddd_core import.
- Replaced right(unit) with OK(unit).
- Replaced left(...) with Failure(...).
.../register_form_bloc_test.dart - Added ddd_core import.
- Replaced right with passCase and left with failCase.
.../ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart - Introduced FAILURE and OKE classes.
- Defined Failure and OK functions.

🐇✨
In the code's burrow, deep and wide,
Changes hop where errors once did hide.
With OK and Failure, clear and bright,
Tests now leap towards the light.
Cheers to clean code, night and day,
In the fields of logic, we rabbits play! 🌟🌿


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05db9b1 and 78419e1.
Files selected for processing (9)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/model/password_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/model/username_.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/repo/authentication_repository_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/login/login_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/login/login_event_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/infra/authen_facade.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ui/lib/widgets/injection.config.dart (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/model/password_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/model/username_.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/login/login_event_test.dart
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/mobile/packages/ui/lib/widgets/injection.config.dart (1)

Line range hint 1-17: The dependency injection setup using GetIt and Injectable is correctly implemented.

apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/repo/authentication_repository_test.dart (2)

3-3: The import path for AuthenticationRepository seems incorrect. Verify if the path should point directly to the package rather than a src directory.

Verification successful

The import path for AuthenticationRepository in the test file is correct. It appropriately points to the src directory where the actual implementation of the repository is located. This is consistent with common Dart practices where the src directory is used to encapsulate implementation details, which are then exposed through a file in the parent directory for external use.

  • File Path: apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/domain/repo/src/authentication_repository.dart
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct import path for `AuthenticationRepository`.

# Test: Search for the correct file path. Expect: Correct path without 'src'.
fd 'authentication_repository.dart'

Length of output: 373



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify the intended use of `authentication_repository.dart` in the 'authentication' feature area.

# Test: Check the contents of both files to determine which is intended for external use.
cat apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/domain/repo/authentication_repository.dart
cat apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/domain/repo/src/authentication_repository.dart

Length of output: 977


5-34: The structure and implementation of the tests for login and logout functionalities are well-done.

apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/infra/authen_facade.dart (1)

13-77: The tests for AuthFacade covering successful login, invalid credentials, and server errors are well-implemented using MockDio.

apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart (1)

10-134: The tests for RegisterFormBloc covering various user interactions during the registration process are well-implemented.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78419e1 and 10e2d1e.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/app_widget.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/presentation/login/login_form.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/presentation/login/login_screen.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/presentation/login/login_screen.dart (1)

9-22: LGTM! The structure and setup of the LoginScreen class are well-implemented and follow good practices for a Flutter widget.

apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/presentation/login/login_form.dart (1)

11-167: LGTM! The LoginForm class effectively uses BlocConsumer to handle state and events, and the implementation of error handling and navigation logic is correct.

apps/mobile/lib/features/app_widget.dart Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10e2d1e and 2316a93.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/login/login_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/login/login_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2316a93 and f9fe932.
Files selected for processing (7)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/ddd_core.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (3)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart (no review received)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart (no review received)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/ddd_core.dart
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/authen_value_objects_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart (2)

3-12: Implementation of Fail class looks correct and adheres to functional programming principles.


15-24: Implementation of OK class looks correct and adheres to functional programming principles.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9fe932 and 7259926.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/domain/use_cases/register_/register_form_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7259926 and 65c0aba.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/forgot_password_cubit_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/login_form_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/lib/features/authentication/test/application/auth_status/register_form_bloc_test.dart
  • apps/mobile/packages/ddd_core/lib/src/ok_fail_test_results.dart

@harrytran998 harrytran998 merged commit 05d3e87 into dev May 11, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@harrytran998 harrytran998 deleted the TML-48 branch May 11, 2024 03:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants