Skip to content

Conversation

ychebotarev
Copy link
Contributor

@ychebotarev ychebotarev commented Jun 2, 2025

What was changed

  • Add "--restore-options" flag to both temporal activity reset and temporal activity update-options
  • Change/fix shortened commands for "activity-id" and "activity-type" parameters.
  • Reordered parameters validation check so it happens before we call "Dial"

Why?

Users should be able to restore original activity options.

antlai-temporal and others added 6 commits March 25, 2025 12:14
Co-authored-by: Spencer Judge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuri <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Hardy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Barzee <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Zhou <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Spencer Judge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuri <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Hardy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Barzee <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Zhou <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dan Davison <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Yuan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chad Retz <[email protected]>
## What was changed
WISOTT
<!--- Note to EXTERNAL Contributors -->
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! 
If it is a significant code change, please **make sure there is an open
issue** for this.
We work best with you when we have accepted the idea first before you
code. -->
<!--- For ALL Contributors 👇 -->

## What was changed
<!-- Describe what has changed in this PR -->
Print Nexus callbacks links in DescribeWorkflowExecution

<img width="1756" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 11 05 21"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/30c41d5f-2643-4b24-867e-1a161622c6af"
/>

## Why?
<!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes -->

## Checklist
<!--- add/delete as needed --->

1. Closes <!-- add issue number here -->

2. How was this tested:
<!--- Please describe how you tested your changes/how we can test them
-->

3. Any docs updates needed?
<!--- update README if applicable
      or point out where to update docs.temporal.io -->
<!--- Note to EXTERNAL Contributors -->
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! 
If it is a significant code change, please **make sure there is an open
issue** for this.
We work best with you when we have accepted the idea first before you
code. -->

<!--- For ALL Contributors 👇 -->

## What was changed
<!-- Describe what has changed in this PR -->

## Why?
<!-- Tell your future self why have you made these changes -->

## Checklist
<!--- add/delete as needed --->

1. Closes <!-- add issue number here -->

2. How was this tested:
<!--- Please describe how you tested your changes/how we can test them
-->

3. Any docs updates needed?
<!--- update README if applicable
      or point out where to update docs.temporal.io -->
Copy link
Member

@cretz cretz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only minor PR comment, but will want to wait to merge until tests are available (i.e. when next-server can get a new tagged release)

@ychebotarev
Copy link
Contributor Author

ychebotarev commented Jun 3, 2025

Only minor PR comment, but will want to wait to merge until tests are available (i.e. when next-server can get a new tagged release)

Note.
I updated server version to current main, because apparently we don't have "tag" for new server release.

@ychebotarev ychebotarev requested a review from cretz June 3, 2025 00:59
@cretz
Copy link
Member

cretz commented Jun 3, 2025

I updated server version to current main, because apparently we don't have "tag" for new server release.

👍 This is good so that we can add tests. However, since this is likely no rush since there's no released server to use this with, I think we should wait to merge until we can update go.mod with a server tag. If figure this will be quite soon anyways.

@ychebotarev
Copy link
Contributor Author

👍 This is good so that we can add tests.

tests are added.

I think we should wait to merge until we can update go.mod with a server tag. If figure this will be quite soon anyways.

This is merge to next-server. Why wait?

@bergundy bergundy requested review from a team as code owners July 8, 2025 20:26
@cretz
Copy link
Member

cretz commented Jul 8, 2025

@ychebotarev - can likely update dependencies to stable tags now...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants