Skip to content

Conversation

Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Sep 8, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

Adding #4220 to upstream navigation in Nightly and 3.16

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Follows up on #4220

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Sep 8, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

The PR preview for dbf466c is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4222.surge.sh

No diff compared to the current base

show diff

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

diff looks reasonable to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants