Tutorial for the RG model #169
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PaulWAyers
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd change this sentence:
"This definition is given at a paper and can be used to validate the numerical results that were kindly provided by the author."
"This definition is given in a paper and can be used to validate numerical results that were kindly provided by Paul Johnson.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This a tutorial for the RG model. I had to change the logic behind the transformation from spin to spatial orbitals but it's very minor change that ended up in a multiplication by 2.
@PaulWAyers can you please take a look at the RG notebook and if it looks ok @JannisErhard should have a clear example on how to match numbers from Paul Johnson's paper.