Fix IoT Hub FAQ license: MIT instead of Apache 2.0 - #598
Merged
Conversation
IoT Hub Terms of Use & Contributor Agreement state that all contributions are licensed under the MIT License, but both FAQ pages said Apache 2.0. Corrected all five mentions and linked the Terms of Use.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Both IoT Hub FAQ pages stated that contributed/published items are released under the Apache 2.0 license. That contradicts the IoT Hub Terms of Use & Contributor Agreement (
src/pages/products/iot-hub/terms-of-use.astro): "All Contributions are officially licensed under the MIT License" — and the listing UI (src/components/IotHub/DetailHero.astro,licenseLabel = 'MIT license').Changes
docs/iot-hub/contribution-guides/faq.mdxdocs/iot-hub/user-guides/faq.mdxNo remaining Apache 2.0 mentions in IoT Hub content.