Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump qemu to v9.2.2 #243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

Bump qemu to v9.2.2 #243

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

Earlopain
Copy link
Contributor

Hopefully this will be enough for #215. Per comments it contains a commit that fixes https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1913, specifically https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/dffec2ddd0240758822c013b13ac9364d785735a

Will test master build if this is merged, we'll see then

Signed-off-by: Earlopain <[email protected]>
@tonistiigi
Copy link
Owner

Not a blocker for this PR, but we should get some libc-bin testcase under e2e if this helps.

@Earlopain
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would leave that to the experts 😅

@tonistiigi tonistiigi merged commit b900248 into tonistiigi:master Feb 27, 2025
44 checks passed
@Earlopain Earlopain deleted the bump-qemu branch February 27, 2025 19:52
@crazy-max crazy-max mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2025
@crazy-max
Copy link
Collaborator

#244 (comment) 👀

@Earlopain
Copy link
Contributor Author

): One other person also linked an PR in the main issue where their builds still fail. I guess it's not fully fixed, though this has seemingly resolved (or massively improved) the issue for my builds.

@booleanbetrayal
Copy link

We are also still getting segmentation faults in QEMU targeting amd64 on arm64 hosts. Is this an issue with tagging buildkit stable at this point? Trying to figure out all the moving pieces on this chessboard. =]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants