Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(suite): add priority fee network feature #16342

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

enjojoy
Copy link
Contributor

@enjojoy enjojoy commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Resolve #16438

Screenshots:

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2025

🚀 Expo preview is ready!

  • Project → trezor-suite-preview
  • Platforms → android, ios
  • Scheme → trezorsuitelite
  • Runtime Version → 26
  • More info

Learn more about 𝝠 Expo Github Action

@enjojoy enjojoy force-pushed the feat/priority-fees branch 13 times, most recently from 1976ef5 to 51b93d9 Compare January 17, 2025 14:40
export interface EstimateFee {
type: typeof RESPONSES.ESTIMATE_FEE;
payload: {
feePerUnit: string;
feePerTx?: string;
feeLimit?: string;
eip1559?: {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be imported from Blockbook

const result = await TrezorConnect.blockchainEstimateFee({
coin: network.symbol,
request: {
blocks: [2],
feeLevels: 'smart',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's needed for BlockchainEstimateFee method in connect. If the feeLevels are "smart", they are being created using FeeLevels.load method

which triggers loadMisc method that builds levels for 1559

It was there before but it wasn't implemented for ethereum

If they're not smart then it returns just one level which is the same as the response from blockbook

Screenshot 2025-01-17 at 15 59 02

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aha, this issue is still open #9185 so I don't know if it will start working out of the box

if (response.eip1559) {
const eip1559LevelKeys = ['low', 'medium', 'high'] as const;

const { eip1559, ...baseLevel } = response;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is this good for? ...baseLevel

Comment on lines 108 to 109
{ ...baseLevel, label: 'normal' as const, blocks: -1, ethFeeType: 'legacy' },
...eip1559Levels,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this makes sense.

normal level is probably low. Lowest fee to make it through

How about, if there is eip1559 available, let's do something like this:

  • low level eip1559 + normal legacy level
  • medium level eip1559 + normal legacy level increased by some constant
  • high level eip1559 + normal legacy level increased by some bigger constant

I am struggling if the constant is needed but probably yes as users can use old fw without eip1559 support.

If eip1559 is available for specific network, suite will check if eip1559 values are available and if not it will fallback to legacy.

But please wait for @martykan @marekrjpolak for their opinions

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would just spread eip levels and add legacy gas there

@enjojoy enjojoy force-pushed the feat/priority-fees branch 3 times, most recently from 8b615ab to a02ee59 Compare January 22, 2025 16:30
Comment on lines +5595 to +5636
FEE_LEVEL_MEDIUM: {
defaultMessage: 'Medium',
id: 'FEE_LEVEL_MEDIUM',
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to introduce new level

@@ -6131,6 +6135,14 @@ export default defineMessages({
id: 'TR_DATA',
defaultMessage: 'Data',
},
TR_MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS: {
id: 'TR_MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS',
defaultMessage: 'Max priority fee per gas',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
defaultMessage: 'Max priority fee per gas',
defaultMessage: 'Max priority fee',

},
TR_MAX_FEE_PER_GAS: {
id: 'TR_MAX_FEE_PER_GAS',
defaultMessage: 'Max fee per gas',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
defaultMessage: 'Max fee per gas',
defaultMessage: 'Max fee',

@@ -34,12 +34,15 @@ export const allowedCardFrameProps = [
] as const satisfies FramePropsKeys[];
type AllowedFrameProps = Pick<FrameProps, (typeof allowedCardFrameProps)[number]>;

const Container = styled.div<{ $fillType: FillType } & TransientProps<AllowedFrameProps>>`
const Container = styled.div<
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably some other (new) component than Card should be used for this

...props
}: FeesProps<TFieldValues>) => {
// Type assertion allowing to make the component reusable, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/73624072.
const shouldUsePriorityFees = network?.features?.includes('eip1559');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const shouldUsePriorityFees = network?.features?.includes('eip1559');
const shouldUsePriorityFees = getNetworkFeatures(symbol).includes("eip1559");

composedLevels?: PrecomposedLevels | PrecomposedLevelsCardano;
label?: TranslationKey;
rbfForm?: boolean;
helperText?: React.ReactNode;
network: Network;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

network not needed here, you have account symbol

@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ export const prepareEthereumTransaction = (txInfo: EthTransactionData) => {
chainId: txInfo.chainId,
nonce: numberToHex(txInfo.nonce),
gasLimit: numberToHex(txInfo.gasLimit),
gasPrice: numberToHex(toWei(txInfo.gasPrice, 'gwei')),
gasPrice: numberToHex(toWei(txInfo.gasPrice || '0', 'gwei')),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In case of legacy, it should probably fail with gasPrice undefined? It will fail with 0 anyways.

const feeInGwei = calculateEthFee(toWei(feeLevel.feePerUnit, 'gwei'), feeLevel.feeLimit || '0');
const feeInGwei = calculateEthFee(
toWei(feeLevel.feePerUnit || '0', 'gwei'),
feeLevel.feeLimit || '0',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note: feeLimit should probably not be undefined. never

{networkType === 'bitcoin' && <BitcoinDetails {...props} />}
{networkType === 'ethereum' && <EthereumDetails {...props} />}
{networkType === 'ripple' && <RippleDetails {...props} />}
{networkType !== 'bitcoin' && networkType !== 'ethereum' && (
<MiscDetails {...props} />
)}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be good to create switch

const theme = useTheme();

return (
<WrapperWithCheckmark selected={selected}>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be feature of the new component added to @trezor/component

@enjojoy enjojoy force-pushed the feat/priority-fees branch from a02ee59 to bef5516 Compare February 3, 2025 11:00
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@enjojoy enjojoy force-pushed the feat/priority-fees branch 5 times, most recently from 9062eec to 816379a Compare February 3, 2025 16:00
@enjojoy enjojoy force-pushed the feat/priority-fees branch from 816379a to f169878 Compare February 4, 2025 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EIP1559: handle eip1559 response in connect and suite
2 participants