Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tiny nitpicks #16821

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

tiny nitpicks #16821

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

mroz22
Copy link
Contributor

@mroz22 mroz22 commented Feb 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications in two parts of the codebase. In one area, a variable in a test file has been renamed from "overriden" to "overridden" to ensure correct spelling without altering the logic or functionality of the test. In another part, the "export" keyword was removed from the declaration of the ErrorGeneric type in the API call types file. This update changes the type’s visibility from exported to internal, preventing its use outside of its defining module. Both updates adjust declarations without modifying the core functionality of the existing logic.

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4ed0ca and 29fa294.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/connect/e2e/tests/device/override.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/transport/src/types/apiCall.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/connect/e2e/tests/device/override.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/transport/src/types/apiCall.ts (1)

12-16: LGTM! Good practice to hide internal types.

Making ErrorGeneric non-exported is a good practice since it's only used internally by the exported ResultWithTypedError and AsyncResultWithTypedError types.

Let's verify there are no external usages that would make this a breaking change:

✅ Verification successful

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any external usage of ErrorGeneric type
rg "ErrorGeneric[<\s]" --type ts

Length of output: 343


LGTM! The verification confirms that ErrorGeneric is only used internally by the exported types, so removing the export keyword does not expose any breaking changes.

  • ErrorGeneric is defined in the same file.
  • It is used only within ResultWithTypedError and AsyncResultWithTypedError, which are the exported types.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mroz22 mroz22 added the no-project This label is used to specify that PR doesn't need to be added to a project label Feb 4, 2025
@mroz22 mroz22 marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2025 14:41
@mroz22 mroz22 merged commit 1697f60 into develop Feb 5, 2025
77 checks passed
@mroz22 mroz22 deleted the nitpicks branch February 5, 2025 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-project This label is used to specify that PR doesn't need to be added to a project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants