Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style:Run dotnet format #496

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Jan 13, 2025

Created by Github Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced file system service with improved logging and user interaction
    • Added more detailed console output for file operations
  • Improvements

    • Updated command handling to better integrate language model generation
    • Improved feedback during file search, reading, and writing processes

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the DoCommand and FileSystemService classes in the CLI project. The modifications focus on enhancing the command handling process by integrating file system services and improving logging mechanisms. The DoCommand class now incorporates file system tools and language model generation, while the FileSystemService class has been updated with more detailed console output to provide better visibility into file-related operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/Cli/src/Commands/DoCommand.cs - Added FileSystemService instantiation
- Integrated language model generation with llm.GenerateAsync()
- Updated output writing process with Helpers.WriteOutputAsync()
src/Cli/src/Commands/FileSystemService.cs - Enhanced logging in FindFilePathsByContentAsync()
- Added console output in ReadContentAsync()
- Improved user interaction in WriteContentAsync()

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DoCommand
    participant FileSystemService
    participant LLM

    User->>DoCommand: Execute command
    DoCommand->>FileSystemService: Create instance
    FileSystemService-->>DoCommand: Service ready
    DoCommand->>LLM: GenerateAsync(inputText)
    LLM-->>DoCommand: Generate response
    DoCommand->>FileSystemService: Write output
    FileSystemService-->>DoCommand: Confirm write
Loading

Poem

🐰 Coding Rabbit's File Adventure 🗂️

With tools and calls, we dance and write,
Logging each step with pure delight,
File paths discovered, content shared,
Our CLI magic, carefully prepared!
Hop, hop, hooray for code so bright! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge January 13, 2025 05:22
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 67bfe42 into main Jan 13, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the bot/auto-format_202501130520 branch January 13, 2025 05:24
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/Cli/src/Commands/FileSystemService.cs (1)

Line range hint 65-74: Consider using a proper logging framework.

Replace Console.WriteLine with a proper logging framework (e.g., Microsoft.Extensions.Logging) for better control over log levels and output destinations.

+    private readonly ILogger<FileSystemService> _logger;
+
+    public FileSystemService(ILogger<FileSystemService>? logger = null)
+    {
+        _logger = logger ?? NullLogger<FileSystemService>.Instance;
+    }

     // In the method:
-    Console.WriteLine($"Found {paths.Count} files:");
+    _logger.LogInformation("Found {Count} files:", paths.Count);
     foreach (var path in paths)
     {
-        Console.WriteLine(path);
+        _logger.LogInformation("Found file: {Path}", path);
     }
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/Cli/src/Commands/DoCommand.cs (2)

26-29: Consider adding error handling for FileSystemService initialization.

While the integration looks good, consider wrapping the FileSystemService initialization and tool registration in a try-catch block to handle potential initialization failures gracefully.

+        try
+        {
           var fileSystemService = new FileSystemService();
           llm.AddGlobalTools(fileSystemService.AsTools(), fileSystemService.AsCalls());
+        }
+        catch (Exception ex)
+        {
+            Console.WriteLine($"Failed to initialize file system tools: {ex.Message}");
+            throw;
+        }

31-31: Add timeout handling for LLM generation.

Consider adding a timeout for the LLM generation to prevent indefinite waits.

-        var response = await llm.GenerateAsync(inputText);
+        using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5));
+        var response = await llm.GenerateAsync(inputText, cts.Token);
src/Cli/src/Commands/FileSystemService.cs (3)

Line range hint 37-49: Consider making file extensions configurable.

The hard-coded list of file extensions could be moved to a configuration file or made configurable through the constructor to improve flexibility.

+    private readonly IReadOnlySet<string> _allowedExtensions;
+
+    public FileSystemService(IEnumerable<string>? allowedExtensions = null)
+    {
+        _allowedExtensions = allowedExtensions?.ToHashSet() ?? 
+            new HashSet<string> { ".txt", ".md", ".json", ".cs", ".csproj", ".sln", ".sh", ".yml", ".yaml" };
+    }

     public async Task<IList<string>> FindFilePathsByContentAsync(...)
     {
         // ...
-        if (extension is not ".txt" and not ".md" and not ".json" and not ".cs" and not ".csproj" and not ".sln" and not ".sh" and not ".yml" and not ".yaml")
+        if (!_allowedExtensions.Contains(extension))
         {
             continue;
         }

80-83: Add file existence check before reading.

Consider adding a file existence check before attempting to read the file.

     public async Task<string> ReadContentAsync(
         string path,
         CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
     {
+        if (!File.Exists(path))
+        {
+            throw new FileNotFoundException($"File not found: {path}");
+        }
         Console.WriteLine($"Reading file at path: {path}");
         return await File.ReadAllTextAsync(path, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
     }

104-108: Consider using a more robust confirmation mechanism.

The current console-based confirmation might not work well in all environments (e.g., CI/CD). Consider adding a parameter to bypass confirmation in automated scenarios.

     public async Task<string> WriteContentAsync(
         string path,
         string newContent,
+        bool skipConfirmation = false,
         CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
     {
+        if (skipConfirmation)
+        {
+            await File.WriteAllTextAsync(path, newContent, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
+            return "File written.";
+        }
         // ... rest of the confirmation logic
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d04ec1 and 06b4485.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Cli/src/Commands/DoCommand.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Cli/src/Commands/FileSystemService.cs (5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test / Build, test and publish

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant