Version 0.2.0 Release #146
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #146 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 351 351
Branches 50 50
=========================================
Hits 351 351 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@jeromekelleher Would it be possible for you to check the changelog for me? If it looks good, I will update the date of the version 0.2.0 in this document, and I hope that we can release the new version soon. |
daikitag
force-pushed
the
version01-update
branch
from
e88bf82 to
7911c41
Compare
|
Sorry, it is version 0.1.0, not 0.2.0. However, I think we can actually make the new release as version 1.0.0, as we had validated the proporties of tstrait, many new functionalities are added to implement the simulation frameworks of other external simulators, and I feel that this is the complete package now. Do you have any thoughts on this? |
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Documentation: | ||
|
|
||
| - Create infrastructure for documentation {pr}`77` | ||
| - Build initial documentation {pr}`78` | ||
| - Add Changelog to documentation {pr}`79` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are you replacing these? the {pr}73 should get interpreted by jupyter book and substituted correctly. If not, the jupyterbook config needs some tweaking
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I looked up the tstrait website, and it seems that {pr} is working, so I modified it just now.
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Contributors: | ||
|
|
||
| - Jerome Kelleher |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Order these alphabetically?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
GitHub will do this anyway, so there's no need to list out the contributors I think (unless you want to)
| ## [0.1.0] - 2024-03-XX | ||
|
|
||
| ### Changes from Version 0.0.1: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you need to make it clearer that this is a breaking change release. What code written using the 0.0.1 version would now break, and what should users do about it?
daikitag
force-pushed
the
version01-update
branch
from
7911c41 to
a3e14ae
Compare
|
I fixed it now, so would it be possible for you to check it again @jeromekelleher ? |
Update the changelog for version0.1.0 release
daikitag
force-pushed
the
version01-update
branch
from
a3e14ae to
33cf5e9
Compare
Update the changelog for version0.2.0 release