Skip to content

Conversation

charlag
Copy link
Contributor

@charlag charlag commented Aug 15, 2025

There was a missing check that migrations bring the version to the latest one.

In addition, we were checking the version against non-populated metadata which worked accidentally on the first run because undefined < 1 === true.

@charlag
Copy link
Contributor Author

charlag commented Aug 15, 2025

I didn't see that e1afa84 also added a check but this fixes few more things

@charlag charlag force-pushed the offline-version-consistent branch 2 times, most recently from e4c1d56 to 07502c6 Compare August 15, 2025 11:01
There was a missing check that migrations bring the version to the
latest one.

In addition, we were checking the version against non-populated
metadata which worked accidentally on the first run because
`undefined < 1 === false`.
@hrb-hub hrb-hub force-pushed the offline-version-consistent branch from 07502c6 to 1eef496 Compare August 29, 2025 08:59
@hrb-hub hrb-hub merged commit 1eef496 into dev-mail Aug 29, 2025
6 checks passed
@hrb-hub hrb-hub deleted the offline-version-consistent branch August 29, 2025 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants