Fix memory leak in Supervisor internal state
#4500
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
durban
commented
Oct 8, 2025
| apply[F](false) | ||
|
|
||
| private sealed abstract class State[F[_]] { | ||
| private[std] sealed abstract class State[F[_]] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most of the changes in Supervisor are just to make it testable (its internal state inspectable).
|
|
||
| case None => (fa, fin) => F.start(fa.guarantee(fin)) | ||
| case None => { (fa, fin) => | ||
| F.start(fa).flatMap { fib => F.start(fib.join.guarantee(fin)).as(fib) } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the actual fix.
(I believe the other case is already correct, because cancel joins the underlying fiber.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should fix issue #4490.
Reproducing that issue with the repro in the description there:
With this PR:
This issue also adds an (ugly) unittest, which inspects the internal state of the
Supervisor. We could remove that, if we're satisfied with the fix, but I think it's useful to have it.(Draft, because the test is racy, so I'm waiting for any possible CI failures.)