Fix AuthorMode of InProceedings#91
Merged
PgBiel merged 2 commits intotypst:mainfrom Sep 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@Drodt Can we go ahead and merge this PR? |
Contributor
|
Sorry, I missed this PR. Drodt isn't from the Typst team, so they cannot merge PRs. Could you add an inproceedings example without an editor to a test file? Ideally, verify it breaks without your changes and works with them. Thanks! |
Contributor
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix inproceedings entry requirements: changed author_eds_field from BothRequired to AuthorRequiredEditorOptional, since according to the BibLaTeX documentation the editor field is optional.