Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Closed in favour of ucgmsim/visualisation#95 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces new plotting tools to address the complexities of evaluating the multi-segment alpine fault ruptures.
There are two new plotting tools:
plot-slip-rise-rake, which extends the original slip-rise-rake plots from old papers to work with multi-segment plots.plot-slip-distribution, which plots the slip distribution of an SRF.Both are tested, but they at present require installing the workflow package, which requires installing the source modelling package... so there are circular dependencies. I am not sure how I will resolve that explicitly. It made involve breaking the plots out of source modelling, or creating two separate packages in this project.