forked from NCAR/ccpp-physics
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
Reduce "Explicit interface or EXTERNAL declaration is required" compiler warnings in sfcsub #312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rhaesung
merged 6 commits into
ufs-community:ufs/dev
from
NickSzapiro-NOAA:warning_explicit_sfcsub
Nov 4, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ed341e
Broaden sfcsub module with external declarations. Use in gcycle
NickSzapiro-NOAA da0729f
Undo added externals in sfcsub.F as last resort
NickSzapiro-NOAA 3e67146
Merge branch 'ufs-community:ufs/dev' into warning_explicit_sfcsub
NickSzapiro-NOAA a46c929
init_nazdir in ugwp_common
NickSzapiro-NOAA 625bb6a
Don't use ugwp_common in module
NickSzapiro-NOAA f3affd2
Merge branch 'ufs-community:ufs/dev' into warning_explicit_sfcsub
NickSzapiro-NOAA File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll let @mdtoyNOAA chime in, but I believe that the
ugwp_commonmodule was supposed to be used for physical constants only. I wonder if it would be preferable to haveinit_nazdirandinit_global_gwdisput into a different module, one that already exists other thanugwp_commonor a new one altogether.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@grantfirl The subroutines init_nazdir and init_global_gwdis are actually not contained within a module. I wasn't the original coder, so I don't know if this was intentional or not. Would containing these two subroutines inside a new module solve the problem?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, any module will do to provide an explicit interface. It doesn't have to be this one
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's probably OK just to leave them in
ugwp_commonif you've already done testing and it works, especially if no one knows of an existing module that they would fit better into.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I left my comment yesterday, I hadn't realized Nick had already moved the two subroutines within module ugwp_common. I'm OK with leaving them in ugwp_common.