Add contributing guidelines and security policy documentation.#9
Add contributing guidelines and security policy documentation.#9terabytesoftw merged 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To continue reviewing without waiting, purchase usage credits in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThree repository governance documents are added or updated: CONTRIBUTING.md establishes development standards, environment requirements, coding conventions, testing expectations, and PR processes; SECURITY.md introduces vulnerability reporting procedures and timelines; PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md replaces its QA table with PR type checkboxes. ChangesRepository Governance & Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Line 1: Update the CONTRIBUTING.md title and placeholders to match this
repository: replace the header "Contributing to PHP Forge" with "Contributing to
ui-awesome" (or the repo's canonical name) and replace the generic "<package>"
placeholders in the install/setup sections with the actual package names or a
short note explaining how to find/replace them (e.g., project package names or
npm/yarn commands); verify any setup commands and examples (install/build/test)
reference the correct package and repo context so contributors aren’t
misdirected.
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Line 9: Update the placeholder URL string
"https://github.com/ui-awesome/<package>" in SECURITY.md so it is actionable:
either replace it with a concrete example repository URL (e.g., a real repo
under ui-awesome) or change the text to explicitly instruct readers to "replace
<package> with the repository name" (for example:
"https://github.com/ui-awesome/<package> — replace <package> with the repository
name"). Ensure the new wording appears in place of the existing placeholder
string so reporters have a clear, runnable target.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 53048e57-1b0a-4d0c-ac57-9228cd0b9bc8
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
CONTRIBUTING.mdPULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdSECURITY.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: linter / Super Linter
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
[style] ~4-~4: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ... - [ ] Bugfix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) - [ ] CI/build configuration ...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e1024febc3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍 ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Pull Request