-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ultralytics Code Refactor https://ultralytics.com/actions #40
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request refactors code to improve performance, readability, and organization in the Ultralytics project. The changes include updating links, optimizing workflows, and simplifying error handling. Class diagram for updated error handling in bing_scraper.pyclassDiagram
class BingScraper {
+single_image(image_url)
}
BingScraper : +open(file_name, "wb")
BingScraper : +output_file.write(data)
BingScraper : +print("completed ====> " + image_name.encode("raw_unicode_escape").decode("utf-8"))
BingScraper : +except (OSError, OSError) as e
BingScraper : +raise e
note for BingScraper "Simplified error handling by combining OSError exceptions"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
👋 Hello @UltralyticsAssistant, thank you for submitting a PR to the Here's a checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review:
For detailed guidance, please refer to our Contributing Guide. If you have any questions during the process, don't hesitate to leave a comment here. Thank you for contributing to Ultralytics! 🌟 Your efforts help improve the tools we offer to the community. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @UltralyticsAssistant - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The PR title and description suggest a significant code refactor, but the actual changes appear to be mostly link updates and minor adjustments. Consider updating the PR description to more accurately reflect the nature of the changes.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
@@ -18,12 +18,11 @@ jobs: | |||
- name: Run Ultralytics Formatting | |||
uses: ultralytics/actions@main | |||
with: | |||
token: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # note GITHUB_TOKEN automatically generated | |||
token: ${{ secrets._GITHUB_TOKEN }} # note GITHUB_TOKEN automatically generated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚨 issue (security): Potential security risk with _GITHUB_TOKEN
The change from ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
to ${{ secrets._GITHUB_TOKEN }}
might introduce a security risk or break the workflow. The underscore prefix is unusual for GitHub's default token. Please verify if this is intentional and ensure it's a valid secret in your repository.
This Ultralytics PR refactors code to improve performance and readability. 🔄
Key changes include:
These changes aim to enhance the overall quality and efficiency of the code. 🌟
Learn more about Ultralytics:
🛠️ PR Summary
Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions
🌟 Summary
This pull request streamlines GitHub token configuration and enhances URL and error handling in the Ultralytics repository for Bing image scraping.
📊 Key Changes
_GITHUB_TOKEN
.bing_scraper.py
to avoid redundancy.🎯 Purpose & Impact