Skip to content

Issues: unicode-org/message-format-wg

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

30 Open 370 Closed
30 Open 370 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Support formatting ranges of numbers, ordinals, dates, times, and datetimes Future Deferred for future standardization registry
#957 opened Nov 22, 2024 by eemeli
[FEEDBACK] Please move style percent to its own function LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview registry
#956 opened Nov 21, 2024 by sffc
3
[^] BALLOT: ACTION-REQUIRED: Submit MessageFormat 2.0 to CLDR-TC ? Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG Ballot Balloting issue LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate
#955 opened Nov 20, 2024 by aphillips
3
Discussion Issue for the Approval Ballot LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate meta
#954 opened Nov 20, 2024 by aphillips
2
Clarify boilerplate about _operand_ and _resolved value_ formatting LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) normative registry
#937 opened Nov 15, 2024 by aphillips
1
Add short timezone identifiers LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) normative registry
#936 opened Nov 14, 2024 by macchiati
2
Well-formed vs valid formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate normative resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
#935 opened Nov 14, 2024 by macchiati
7
Clean up all mention of tech preview etc. Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
#931 opened Nov 11, 2024 by aphillips
@aphillips
2
[FEEDBACK] Implementing u:dir is a little bit tricky documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#918 opened Oct 27, 2024 by eemeli
3
[FEEDBACK] Simpler formulation of Pattern Selection formatting Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#898 opened Oct 3, 2024 by macchiati
11
Add optional normative guidance on bidi/whitespace serialization Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) syntax Issues related with MF Syntax
#889 opened Sep 16, 2024 by aphillips
CLDR semantic datetime skeleton spec is nearly ready and MF2 should use it LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) registry
#866 opened Aug 22, 2024 by sffc
12
TC39-TG2 would like to see completion of the TG5 study LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#865 opened Aug 22, 2024 by sffc
Ask ICU-TC for feedback Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable)
#864 opened Aug 22, 2024 by echeran
Update CLDR test data Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate organizational Issues related with MF group organization and workflow test-suite
#856 opened Aug 8, 2024 by aphillips
@echeran
1
[FEEDBACK] What is the semantic difference between local declaration using itself, and an input declaration Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
#819 opened Jul 9, 2024 by lucacasonato
1
7
[FEEDBACK] The re-use of :function between "annotation" and "output" positions can be a bit confusing Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
#818 opened Jul 9, 2024 by lucacasonato
5
Update WG documentation to reflect change in status of default registry format materials Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG documentation Improvements or additions to documentation editorial
#817 opened Jul 9, 2024 by aphillips
@aphillips
Ask W3C TAG for feedback Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable)
#805 opened Jun 3, 2024 by aphillips
@aphillips
Consider adding a token grammar Future Deferred for future standardization specification
#729 opened Mar 14, 2024 by catamorphism
2
[FEEDBACK] Message Format Unquoted Literals Future Deferred for future standardization Preview-Feedback Feedback gathered during the technical preview resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon. syntax Issues related with MF Syntax
#724 opened Mar 13, 2024 by macchiati
4
Restrict literals for :date and :time LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) registry
#680 opened Feb 22, 2024 by eemeli
1
10
Review non-integral exact number selection algorithm blocker-candidate The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) registry Seek-Feedback-in-Preview Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period
#675 opened Feb 21, 2024 by eemeli
1
3
Provide structure in the registry for distinguishing types of options normative registry resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon. specification
#663 opened Feb 18, 2024 by macchiati
6
We should not require * if the variant keys exhaust all possibilities formatting LDML 47 LDML 47 Release (Stable) registry Seek-Feedback-in-Preview Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period syntax Issues related with MF Syntax
#603 opened Jan 15, 2024 by eemeli
@stasm
14
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.