-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PX4 integration #181
Comments
Hi @petergerten , no, so far no one has worked on PX4 integration yet. |
What would be involved in integrating with PX4? Is that covered under the |
Hi @dmvinson if you want to try and implement a lockstep version of PX4 SITL paired with one of the environments in this repo, it would be great and I'm happy to advise/guide/PR review the process. I would start from the example in In this case the SITL is NOT in lockstep (the PyBullet simulation and the SITL of Betaflight run in parallel in separate processes gym-pybullet-drones/gym_pybullet_drones/envs/BetaAviary.py Lines 85 to 89 in 3d7b12e
and communication happens over UDP gym-pybullet-drones/gym_pybullet_drones/envs/BetaAviary.py Lines 158 to 163 in 3d7b12e
I believe that something similar using the default UDP/TCP port of SITL PX4 (see this diagram) and WITH THE ADDITION of lockstep execution (see this paragraph could be implemented by creating a new example |
Thanks for the guidance, I'll take a look at this over the next few days. I appreciate your help! |
Did anybody integrate PX4 SITL with this framework to utilize it for higher level objectives?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: