-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stereo Approaches #418
Open
ST6-Bravo
wants to merge
14
commits into
vatpac-technology:main
Choose a base branch
from
ST6-Bravo:Stero
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Stereo Approaches #418
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ae5e586
Stereo Approaches
ST6-Bravo 674bbea
Stereo Approach Chart
ST6-Bravo 62a3d3c
WLM Stereo Approach Example
ST6-Bravo fe45fa4
Merge branch 'Stero' of https://github.com/ST6-Bravo/sops into Stero
ST6-Bravo 098f561
Removed Diagram
ST6-Bravo c4ed091
Moved the Appraoch into its own area
ST6-Bravo 64f9eec
Formatting
ST6-Bravo cbc7a07
Aircraft List
ST6-Bravo b35a8bf
Merge branch 'vatpac-technology:main' into Stero
ST6-Bravo 0158078
Standardisation
mattkelly4 c6c55bb
Merge branch 'vatpac-technology:main' into Stero
ST6-Bravo 86aa7a0
Edit explanation
mattkelly4 3f1bb06
Adjust YWLM stereo procedure & airspace
mattkelly4 670c134
Merge branch 'vatpac-technology:main' into Stero
ST6-Bravo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alphadelta332 @ST6-Bravo either of you guys know what the upper limit of the WLM TMA is when both positions are online?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not particularly well documented in the SOPs at the moment, but I don't believe there is a default. It's just whatever additional airspace is released or RAs activated above F125
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah ok. I had a look at work today, there's an airspace segment which extends above the eastern TMA block to FL600 but we don't want FL600 TMAs haha. Maybe we could top it out at say FL245?