Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bucholz ATCT Rewrite #446

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Bucholz ATCT Rewrite #446

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

obla
Copy link
Contributor

@obla obla commented Jan 23, 2025

TODO

  • Determine position names and update SOPs/Position List
  • Change ATIS frequency
  • Confirm all changes prior to release

Summary

Complete rewrite of KPWA based on Oakland ARTCC procedures.

https://oakartcc.org/web/viewer.html?file=/controllers/file/397c75ae-c41c-11ef-a1be-2a32edb55910

Changes

  • Updated KPWA to match Oakland procedures

Complete rewrite of KPWA based on Oakland ARTCC procedures.

https://oakartcc.org/web/viewer.html?file=/controllers/file/397c75ae-c41c-11ef-a1be-2a32edb55910

Their SOP stipulates KWA_TWR where as we use PKWA_TWR.
ATIS frequency also needs to change.
Oakland Oceanic issues a “depart at-or-after” time and a “clearance void” time with each release. Tower must ensure these times are met.
Tower must call Oakland Oceanic with a departure time on each outbound aircraft.
Tower must advise departures to squawk 2000 and contact San Francisco Radio on the appropriate frequency.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you reckon it'd be possible to include a phraseology example here and in the arrivals section?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely can write something up, although aiming to keep it as close to the Oakland SOP as possible for future updates.

Is it worth referencing the Oakland DOC?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth referencing the Oakland DOC?

Yeah I suppose so, if that's our reference source for any info

Definitely can write something up, although aiming to keep it as close to the Oakland SOP as possible for future updates.

Yeah just to give some context to what we're prescribing I guess

@mattkelly4 mattkelly4 added notify Send notification to Discord on merge Awaiting Changes Awaiting requested changes from the pull request author labels Jan 24, 2025
@mattkelly4 mattkelly4 self-requested a review January 26, 2025 05:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattkelly4 mattkelly4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As requested by Alex (just updating PR status)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Changes Awaiting requested changes from the pull request author notify Send notification to Discord on merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants