-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
[rollout] fix: use the same request_ids in each rollout turn for better tracking in rollout backend #5271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
PeterSH6
wants to merge
1
commit into
verl-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
PeterSH6:gm/request_id
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
[rollout] fix: use the same request_ids in each rollout turn for better tracking in rollout backend #5271
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ async def generate( | |
| """ | ||
| server = self._choose_server(request_id) | ||
| output = await server.generate.remote( | ||
| request_id=uuid4().hex, # use new request_id for each turn | ||
| request_id=request_id, # use the same request_id for better tracking | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We better to use new request_id for each turn |
||
| prompt_ids=prompt_ids, | ||
| sampling_params=sampling_params, | ||
| image_data=image_data, | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using the same
request_idacross multiple turns could lead to issues if the backend relies on uniquerequest_ids for identifying individual requests. This might cause incorrect caching or interference between turns. It's important to ensure that the backend system can handle the samerequest_idfor related turns within a trajectory without any conflicts or errors.Consider adding a mechanism to ensure uniqueness across different trajectories, perhaps by incorporating a trajectory ID or session ID into the
request_id.