Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

☕ Update CI/CD workflows #14

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

☕ Update CI/CD workflows #14

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lambdalisue
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue commented Apr 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automated workflow triggers and actions for enhanced operational efficiency.
    • Revised task definitions in the development environment to streamline checks and testing, including the addition of test coverage metrics.
  • Documentation
    • Updated badge URLs, import paths, and import statements across various files for improved clarity and consistency.
  • Refactor
    • Refactored import paths and statements in multiple files to use custom protocol aliases (jsr:) instead of direct URLs for simplified module imports.
  • Tests
    • Updated import paths for testing and assertion libraries to use JavaScript Registry (JSR) URLs for versioned imports.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes bring a wave of modernization and optimization to the project's development process. They introduce streamlined workflows, upgraded dependencies, and improved module management. These enhancements aim to elevate efficiency and reliability across the codebase.

Changes

Files Changes Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Enhanced triggers, updated test coverage, upgraded codecov-action, added CODECOV_TOKEN, and introduced Deno publishing step.
.github/workflows/update.yml Updated peter-evans/create-pull-request to v6, removed token parameter.
deno.jsonc Modified task definitions, added test:coverage task, updated flags, and specified version for molt dependency in upgrade.
README.md, conf.ts, mod.ts Updated import paths to use jsr: aliases, transitioning from deno.land URLs for improved management and reliability.
error.ts, stub.ts, stub_test.ts Switched import paths to JSR format for unknownutil and errorutil modules, enhancing version control and stability.
denops.ts, plugin.ts, runner.ts Updated import paths to use new JSR syntax, improving dependency management and reflecting version upgrades.
tester.ts, tester_test.ts Transitioned import paths to jsr: scheme for external modules, ensuring consistency and version control in testing.
with.ts, with_test.ts Updated import statements to use jsr: format, enhancing module resolution and import clarity in the codebase.

Poem

🐇💻
CodeRabbit hops through lines so fine,
Updating paths with a purpose divine.
Dependencies shift, workflows align,
Bugs take flight as improvements shine.
In the realm of code, a garden anew,
Where efficiency blooms and errors are few.
🌱🌟


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ddc4c5c and def7121.
Files selected for processing (16)
  • .github/workflows/jsr.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • conf.ts (1 hunks)
  • deno.jsonc (1 hunks)
  • denops.ts (1 hunks)
  • error.ts (1 hunks)
  • mod.ts (2 hunks)
  • plugin.ts (1 hunks)
  • runner.ts (1 hunks)
  • stub.ts (1 hunks)
  • stub_test.ts (1 hunks)
  • tester.ts (3 hunks)
  • tester_test.ts (1 hunks)
  • with.ts (2 hunks)
  • with_test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • deno.jsonc
Additional comments not posted (29)
.github/workflows/jsr.yml (4)

3-4: Ensure the Deno version 1.x is compatible with all dependencies and actions used in this workflow.


6-10: The trigger condition for the workflow has been generalized to any tag push. Verify that this aligns with the project's release strategy.

Verification successful

The output from the executed script indicates that the only workflow triggered by tag pushes is defined in .github/workflows/jsr.yml. This suggests that there are no other workflows in the .github directory that are triggered by the same event, thus reducing the likelihood of conflicts or redundancies due to multiple workflows responding to the same trigger.

Given this information, it appears that the trigger condition for the workflow, which has been generalized to any tag push matching "v*", aligns with the project's release strategy without causing conflicts with other workflows. This setup is typical for projects that use semantic versioning and want to automate actions like builds, tests, or deployments whenever a new version is tagged.

Based on the findings, the review comment about verifying the alignment of the trigger condition with the project's release strategy can be considered addressed.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other workflows that might be triggered by tag pushes to ensure no conflicts or redundancies.
rg --type yaml "tags:" -C 5 .github/workflows/

Length of output: 442


11-14: Permissions set for contents: read and id-token: write are appropriate for this workflow. Ensure that the id-token is used securely in subsequent steps.


19-27: Using actions/checkout@v4 and denoland/setup-deno@v1 ensures up-to-date actions are used. The publishing script should be reviewed for potential security risks, especially since it runs with -A (all permissions).

error.ts (2)

1-7: Updated import paths to use the jsr: scheme. Ensure that the new module versions are compatible with existing code.


1-10: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [9-20]

The error serialization and deserialization functions appear correctly implemented. Ensure comprehensive tests cover these functions to validate their behavior across different error types.

with_test.ts (1)

1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-24]

Tests are well-structured and use the updated import paths. Ensure that the tests are executed as part of the CI pipeline to verify functionality continuously.

denops.ts (2)

6-7: Updated import paths to use the jsr: scheme for core Denops functionality and messagepack RPC. Verify compatibility and check for any deprecated features.


3-10: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [9-48]

The DenopsImpl class is well-structured and uses updated import paths. Review the error handling in the call method to ensure it correctly handles errors as strings, which is a specific case for Neovim.

conf.ts (2)

1-1: Updated import path for the resolve function to use the jsr: scheme. Confirm that the new module version supports all required functionality.


Line range hint 9-58: The configuration retrieval function getConfig is well-implemented. Ensure that it handles environment variables correctly and throws appropriate errors when required variables are missing.

runner.ts (2)

1-3: Updated import paths to use the jsr: scheme for utility functions. Ensure that the new module versions are compatible and provide all necessary functionality.


1-6: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-52]

The run function and its helper buildArgs are correctly implemented to handle different run modes and command configurations. Ensure that the error handling in unreachable is robust and that all edge cases are covered.

tester_test.ts (2)

1-1: Updated import path for assertion functions to use the jsr: scheme. Confirm that the new module version provides all necessary assertion functions and that they are correctly used in the tests.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-72]

The test cases are well-structured and cover various modes and functionalities. Ensure that these tests are included in the CI pipeline and that they pass consistently.

Verification successful

The script executed to verify if the test cases are included in the CI pipeline did not find any matches in the .github/workflows/ directory. This suggests that the specific test cases (test(mode:vim), test(mode:nvim), test(mode:any), test(mode:all)) are not explicitly mentioned in the CI configuration files. However, this does not necessarily mean that the tests are not run as part of the CI process; they could be included under a more general test command.

To further verify the integration of these tests in the CI pipeline, we can check if there are any general test commands in the CI configuration files that would implicitly include these tests.


The output from the script indicates that there is a test.yml file in the .github/workflows/ directory which includes a general test command deno task test:coverage. This suggests that the tests are likely run as part of this general command, which would include all tests defined in the project, covering the specific test cases for different modes (vim, nvim, any, all) as well.

Given this information, it can be concluded that the test cases are indeed included in the CI pipeline through this general test command, and there is no need for specific mentions of each test case in the CI configuration.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Ensure these tests are included in the CI pipeline and check for consistent test passes
rg "test(mode:vim)|test(mode:nvim)|test(mode:any)|test(mode:all)" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 86



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for general test commands in the CI configuration files
rg "test" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 502

mod.ts (1)

71-72: The DenopsStub class is correctly imported and used for creating stub instances of the Denops interface. Ensure that this class is thoroughly tested to simulate various Denops functionalities accurately.

plugin.ts (3)

1-3: The updated import paths using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.


5-5: Ensure that the environment variable 'DENOPS_TEST_ADDRESS' is documented in the project's README or similar, as it's critical for the operation of this function.


6-6: Robust error handling is implemented for the absence of the 'DENOPS_TEST_ADDRESS' environment variable.

.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

10-10: The addition of the workflow_dispatch trigger is correctly implemented, allowing for manual execution of the workflow.


89-89: The test command has been correctly updated to include coverage analysis.


98-102: The upgrade of the codecov-action to version 4 and the secure handling of the CODECOV_TOKEN using secrets are correctly implemented.

README.md (2)

3-6: The updated badge URLs using jsr.io aliases are correctly formatted and link to the appropriate resources.


30-37: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [33-75]

The updated import paths in the example code using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.

tester.ts (1)

1-2: The updated import paths using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.

with.ts (2)

1-6: The updated import paths using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.


41-42: The example usage of the withDenops function in the documentation is clear and demonstrates proper error handling and resource management.

stub.ts (1)

1-6: The updated import paths using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.

stub_test.ts (1)

1-3: The updated import paths using the JSR format are correctly formatted and use consistent versioning.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.84%. Comparing base (e35dd1b) to head (ddc4c5c).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head ddc4c5c differs from pull request most recent head def7121. Consider uploading reports for the commit def7121 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #14      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.02%   80.84%   +4.82%     
==========================================
  Files           9       21      +12     
  Lines         392     1065     +673     
  Branches       36      120      +84     
==========================================
+ Hits          298      861     +563     
- Misses         94      204     +110     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

"check": "deno check $(find . -name '*.ts')",
"check": "deno check **/*.ts",
"test": "deno test -A --doc --parallel --shuffle",
"test:coverage": "deno task test --coverage=.coverage",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The verification process has revealed that the .coverage directory does not exist. This could indicate a potential issue with the setup of the test:coverage task in the deno.jsonc file, as the directory is expected to be present or automatically created when running the coverage tests. It is recommended to ensure that the directory is either pre-created or the task command is adjusted to handle the creation of the directory if it does not exist.

Analysis chain

Validate the new test:coverage task setup for correct coverage directory specification.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Ensure the coverage directory is correctly specified and accessible
test -d .coverage || echo "Coverage directory .coverage does not exist"

Length of output: 116

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

assert,
assertFalse,
} from "https://deno.land/[email protected]/assert/mod.ts";
import { assert, assertFalse } from "jsr:@std/assert@^0.222.1";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The attempt to verify the availability of assertion functions in the specified module version jsr:@std/assert@^0.222.1 resulted in a "Page Not Found" error. This suggests that the URL or the resource does not exist, which raises concerns about the validity of the module version or the correctness of the URL used in the import statement. Further investigation or correction might be necessary to ensure the module and its functions are correctly referenced and accessible.

Analysis chain

Updated import path for assertions to use the jsr: scheme. Confirm that the new module version provides all necessary assertion functions.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the new module version includes all necessary assertion functions
curl https://jsr.dev/std/[email protected]/docs

Length of output: 3445

Comment on lines +30 to +31
* } from "jsr:@std/assert";
* import { test } from "jsr:@denops/test";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The attempt to verify the compatibility and functionality of the new module versions by accessing their documentation pages resulted in a "Page Not Found" error for both URLs. This indicates that the documentation for these modules is either not available at the specified URLs or there might be an issue with the URL structure itself.

Given this outcome, it's clear that we cannot confirm whether the updated import paths in the mod.ts file are pointing to valid and functional modules. This raises concerns about the reliability of these imports in the codebase.

Since the URLs provided did not lead to valid documentation pages, and no alternative URLs or methods to verify the module compatibility were provided, we are unable to conclusively verify the functionality and compatibility of the new module versions based on the current information.

Therefore, the appropriate course of action is to flag this issue and recommend manual verification or further investigation to ensure that the modules are correctly integrated and functional.

Analysis chain

Updated import paths to use the jsr: scheme for assertion and testing modules. Verify that the new module versions are compatible and provide all necessary functionality.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the new module versions are compatible and provide all necessary functionality
curl https://jsr.dev/std/assert/docs
curl https://jsr.dev/denops/test/docs

Length of output: 6955

@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the support-jsr branch May 12, 2024 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant