Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add spec tests for jenkins::slave::tunnel parameter #844

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ghoneycutt
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ghoneycutt
Copy link
Member Author

ghoneycutt commented Feb 8, 2018

Adds on to #840

@ghoneycutt ghoneycutt requested a review from jhoblitt February 8, 2018 19:33
@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

@ghoneycutt Do you mean #840 ?

@ghoneycutt
Copy link
Member Author

@alexjfisher yes, thanks!

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

@ghoneycutt Would you mind if #843 went in first and then rebasing and checking the rubocop violations that PR fixed haven't been reintroduced?

@jhoblitt
Copy link
Member

jhoblitt commented Feb 8, 2018

It needs to be rebased to be a FF merge anyways.

@alexjfisher
Copy link
Member

@jhoblitt Would you prefer all merges to be fast-forward only? I think this can be configured (we don't usually enforce that, but I think we could trial it on this project if you wanted).

@jhoblitt
Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher I've never been a stickler about requiring general PRs to be a FF merge, although, I always ensure that my PRs are.

@jhoblitt
Copy link
Member

@ghoneycutt Could you rebase?

@vox-pupuli-tasks
Copy link

Dear @ghoneycutt, thanks for the PR!

This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?

You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks

@vox-pupuli-tasks
Copy link

Dear @ghoneycutt, thanks for the PR!

This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?

You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Sep 16, 2022

Closing for inactivity.

@ekohl ekohl closed this Sep 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants