Skip to content

Why was the adversarial example obtained by MIPVerify not considered a genuine counterexample when incorporated into the actual reasoning process? #734

Why was the adversarial example obtained by MIPVerify not considered a genuine counterexample when incorporated into the actual reasoning process?

Why was the adversarial example obtained by MIPVerify not considered a genuine counterexample when incorporated into the actual reasoning process? #734

Workflow file for this run

name: TagBot
on:
issue_comment:
types:
- created
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
TagBot:
if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' || github.actor == 'JuliaTagBot'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: JuliaRegistries/TagBot@v1
with:
token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
ssh: ${{ secrets.DOCUMENTER_KEY }}