Skip to content

Issues: w3c/rdf-semantics

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

remove informative section about reification, collections, and containers from Semantics needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial
#85 opened Feb 7, 2025 by pfps
remove rdf:plainLiteral from Semantics? needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting spec:substantive Change in the spec affecting its normative content (class 3) –see also spec:bug, spec:new-feature
#84 opened Feb 7, 2025 by pfps
Update document for RDF 1.2 publication Editorial Errata management: this erratum is editorial spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
#78 opened Jan 31, 2025 by afs
completeness of RDFS entailment rules spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
#76 opened Jan 31, 2025 by pfps
New entailment pattern rdfD1
#70 opened Jan 21, 2025 by doerthe
Update change notes Editorial Errata management: this erratum is editorial spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
#62 opened Dec 13, 2024 by afs
Explain how classic RDF reification relates to triple terms and rdf:reifies spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
#61 opened Dec 12, 2024 by niklasl
HTML code in the spec has bad quality propose closing Proposed for closing spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
#51 opened Nov 1, 2024 by domel
Define an interpretation of Triple Terms needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting
#49 opened Sep 25, 2024 by niklasl
ProTip! no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.